Wednesday, 31 January 2018

THE ICE CREAM FROM HELL.

ONE HELL OF AN ICE CREAM.

I don’t need to think how I might compose an introduction to the following post from VIGILANT CITIZEN. It speaks for itself. I did see a small article about this new franchise some days ago and planned to return to it to establish its veracity and perhaps post on it. And how would you be? My previous post looked at blasphemy in a clothing ad. and now this. So I am now prompted to dig up some more that occurs in the so-called art world, so look out for it – not because of any sensationalist factor, but because all this points to a trend of attacks against Christianity that society should be aware of to make some conclusion about where we are heading…….. and that, whether one is a Christian or not. So prepare yourself, because this is awful. [Have to wonder if an Ally Akbar Ice Cream Co. will be next. I don’t think so]!!

Sweet Jesus: The Disturbing Marketing of a Trendy Ice Cream Franchise

January 30, 2018

The marketing surrounding Sweet Jesus is based on satanic symbolism combined with children in creepy and questionable situations.

Sweet Jesus is an absurdly popular ice cream chain that’s been around for a few years and is quickly expanding in Canada and the United States. Deemed “Toronto’s Most Overrated Ice Cream” by the Globe and Mail, Sweet Jesus nevertheless attracts huge crowds on a daily basis. The chain has been enjoying lots of media coverage and because its stores are custom-made to be “Instagrammable”, Sweet Jesus is all over social media.

The chain does not only serve ice cream to its customers: The “experience” also involves intense imagery and Biblical references. This peculiarity even prompted a lengthy article on Medium that analyzes the “Christian symbolism” of the shop. While the article is very in-depth and used all kinds of references, it completely missed one point: The symbolism is not Christian, it is satanic. But it was close … satanic symbolism is based on the inversion and the corruption of Christian symbols and Biblical references.

The logo consists of the words Sweet Jesus combined with two satanic symbols: An inverted cross and a lightning bolt.

These two symbols are an important part of the imagery of the Church of Satan.

An altar of the Church of Satan with inverted crosses.

To those who say: “The inverted cross is not satanic, it is actually the Cross of St Peter. I read that on Wikipedia”. Nope! In this context, it is satanic. Satanic Black Masses are all about the inversion of Christian symbols to represent a diametrically inverted philosophy.

The symbol of the lightning bolt is also prevalent in satanism. It most likely originates from the Bible passage where Jesus said: “I saw Satan falling like lightning from heaven”.

The sigil of Anton Lavey (the founder of the Church of Satan) features a lightning bolt inside an inverted pentagram. A sigil is a symbol used in ceremonial magic to represent the magician’s outcome (and to summon demons).

A Marilyn Manson promo poster. He’s a member of the Church of Satan.

These two symbols make up the logo of Sweet Jesus.

The Sweet Jesus logo in front of a shop.

Inverted cross, lightning bolt, pyramid, eyeballs. Remember when eating ice cream was not a satanic ritual?

The marketing of the brand is all about ridiculing Jesus combined with satanic symbolism.

That’s funny because Jesus bore his cross before he got crucified. Also, gluttony is considered to be one of the seven deadly sins by some Christian denominations.

Other ads combine Christianity with thinly veiled sexual innuendos.

“Let Sweet (lightning bolt) (inverted cross) Jesus into your mouth” … Um, no thanks.

“Love is patient, love is kind” is the beginning of a popular Bible verse. It is followed in this ad by “but you can’t lick it so who cares”. The popsicle stick is held in a phallic matter. There are satanic symbols on the chalice. But who cares.

This ad cites the commandment about using the Lord’s name in vain … followed by using the Lord’s name in vain. And of course, satanic symbols on the commandment tablet.

Here’s another “project” by the same graphic designer. Since it is not an ad selling ice cream, it is a little more … blatant.

Another creation by graphic designer Murilo Maciel.

Although none of this would EVER exist if it ridiculed any other religion, one can still dismiss the above as an attempt at being “edgy and clever”. However, there’s more.

Sweet Jesus also created ads involving children. And they’re creepy. Not fun creepy. They confirm that this is not simply about being “edgy” … there’s a connection with the darker, more sinister side of the occult elite: Preying on children.

Using Children

Most of the marketing surrounding Sweet Jesus involves fashion magazine-style photoshoots involving children and ice cream. One might think: “Well, that’s normal enough, right? Children love ice cream.” But these pictures involve children in a creepy way. At best, the pics “adultize” children. At worse, they sexualize them.

This kid is dressed like a sailor and he’s doing all kinds of adult things: Smoking, wearing tattoos, drinking coffee from a cup with a satanic logo. But, more importantly, why does the kid have a bruised eye? Child abuse?

This picture is very creepy. First, the entire thing is reminiscent of the horribly exploitative world of child pageants. This blond girl looks eerily similar to JonBenet Ramsey – the child pageant star who got savagely murdered in bizarre circumstances. Also, the girl has pink stuff around her mouth reminiscent of blood. To make things even more disturbing, the girl has bunny ears – not unlike Playboy bunnies.

The company’s IG page featured this “behind the scenes” pic of the above picture, along with the borderline creepy comment “Tough day at the office, eh kiddo.”. The other comments got real.

These two boys have strange animal masks on their heads. You know who else loves to wear strange animal masks?

These guys! (This is a picture from the Church of Satan website).

This girl has one eye emphasized by a magnifying glass – effectively doing the one eye sign. The magnifying glass’ handle is actually an antler.

In occult circles, holding animal horns or antlers represent drawing power from Baphomet.

Occultist Marina Abramovic holding the horns of a goat. Powerful occult meaning.

This girl has a “crown” made of what looks like tiny antlers. She looks like she has blood all over her hand and she is also sucking on her thumb. No.

A shirtless kid. He has the satanic symbols right on his glasses. Nope.

People from Sweet Jesus donating to “Sick Kids” … Not before they teach the kids how to throw up the devil horns, though.

In Conclusion

Associating the decadence of deserts with the devil is nothing new. However, Sweet Jesus takes thing way further. It is not simply about “edgy images”, it is about an entire culture that is perfectly in line with the occult elite.

As seen in previous articles on this site, a main agenda of the occult elite is the normalization of powerful satanic symbolism, which is based on the corruption and desecration of Christian symbols. But that’s just the surface of it. The marketing of Sweet Jesus also subtly implies the corruption and desecration of children. This is where things stop being “cool and edgy” and the ugly head of pure evil sticks out.

And there’s nothing sweet about it.

Tuesday, 30 January 2018

THE EU SANCTIFIES BLASPHEMY.

Jesus In Jeans.

Advertising, Strasbourg: it is permissible to use Jesus and Mary on posters and on the web

IN SHORT: A Lithuanian court fined the company responsible for depicting Our Lord and Our Lady in a clothing ad. [around $1000 Aud.], following a complaint from a Catholic group [there can’t be too many of those in Lithuania]. The company appealed to the EU court of Human Rights which subsequently over-ruled the Lithuanian court and ordered them to repay the company. Such is the totalitarian power of the EU that it can over-rule the self-determination of a sovereign state.

And readers will anticipate my next point: according to the EU the ad. is not inciting hate and religious symbology is up for grabs. So, why will NO country in the world permit even the public propagation of a benign image of Mohammed, let alone for advertising, satire or animation? Okay, that’s a rhetorical question as we all know why, but what’s good for the goose is obviously offensive to the gander.

Here is the article for those with too much time on their hands……….

ROME – The European Court of Human Rights legitimizes and defends the use of religious symbols in advertising and condemns Lithuania for having fined a company that used Jesus and Mary on posters and the internet to sell clothes. According to the judges, the fine imposed for “offended public morality” violated the right to freedom of expression of the company.

The facts date back to 2012 when a Lithuanian company that produces clothes launches an advertising campaign using the photo of a man and a woman with a halo, he in jeans and tattooed, she with a white dress and a beaded necklace, accompanied by phrases “Jesus, what trousers!”, “Dear Mary, what dress!” and “Jesus and Mary, what do you wear!”.
The advertisements triggered a series of protests sent to the National Agency for the Defense of Consumer Rights.

The latter, after asking the opinion of the self-regulating body of the advertising specialists and the Lithuanian episcopal conference, concluded that the advertisements did not respect religion and therefore were a violation of public morals and imposed a fine of 580 euros on the company. .

In today’s ruling, which will become final within 3 months if the parties do not appeal, the judges affirm that the national authorities have a wide margin of maneuver on similar issues especially in cases involving a commercial use of religious symbols.

However, the prosecutors point out that the advertisements in question “do not appear to be gratuitous offensive or profane” and “do not incite hatred”, and therefore the authorities are required to provide relevant and sufficient reasons why they would be contrary to public morality. Instead in this case the reasons given by the authorities “are vague and do not explain with sufficient accuracy why the reference in advertisements to religious symbols was offensive”.

In particular, the Court criticizes the authorities for having judged that advertisements “promoted a lifestyle incompatible with the principles of a religious person” without explaining what the encouraged lifestyle was and how the photos and captions in question were favoring it. . The judges are also critical of the fact that the only religious group consulted to judge the case was the Catholic group.

The sentence states that the Court of Strasbourg considers that “freedom of expression is one of the essential foundations of a democratic society and one of the basic conditions for its progress and for the individual self-realization of each person”. It also “extends to ideas that shock, offend or disturb”. He also emphasizes that the Lithuanian authorities have held publicity contrary to public morality because they have used religious symbols “for superficial purposes”, “distorting their main purpose” and being “inappropriate”.

However, for the Court these findings are “vague and insufficient to explain why the reference to religious symbols in advertisements is offensive, if not for the fact that the purpose is not religious”. Moreover, for the judges, the images “do not seem gratuitous offensive or profane, nor do they incite hatred for reasons of faith or attack a religion in an abusive or gratuitous way”.

The court concludes that the local authorities have not “reached the right balance between the protection of public morals and the rights of religious people on the one hand, the right to freedom of expression of the company on the other”. The positions they expressed, he justified, “show that they have given

total priority to protect the sentiments of religious people, without taking into consideration the right to freedom of expression of the company. “Vilnius, therefore, will have to compensate the company with 580 euros.

A DEEP STATE CATHOLIC SPRING? | john namnik

Thursday, 25 January 2018

THE SHAMANIC MASS | john namnik

Sunday, 7 January 2018

LIES, DAMN LIES and THE LEFTIST PRESS.

AFRICAN GANG VIOLENCE is skewed by mainstream media to avoid racial profiling and to fit the cultural marxist narrative which hails diversity through the immigration of anti-cultures.

From the Guardian, 3.1.2018, written by Calla Wahlquist:

[Full article: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/jan/03/is-melbourne-in-the-grip-of-african-gangs-the-facts-behind-the-lurid-headlines?utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=GU+Today+AUS+v1+-+AUS+morning+mail+callout&utm_term=259008&subid=21496537&CMP=ema_632]

EXCERPT..........

What do the statistics say?

Reading the crime statistics is difficult because there are a number of factors at play.

On the face of it, Sudanese immigrants are over-represented in the crime statistics. About 1.5% of criminal offenders in Victoria are Sudanese, the Victorian Crime Statistics Agency (CSA) told a federal parliamentary inquiry on migrant settlement outcomes, while the Sudanese and South Sudanese communities together make up just 0.5% of the state’s total population.

The majority of crimes in Victoria, unsurprisingly, are committed by people born in Australia. The second-highest cohort were New Zealanders, which are the fourth-largest migrant group in Victoria.

However, by pulling out particular offences you can highlight certain groups. For example, in charges of riot and affray, people born in Sudan made up 6% of all recorded offenders, compared with 71.5% born in Australia and 5.2% born in New Zealand.

Prepare to see these statistics manipulated in many ways, by both sides of politics, as the state election draws closer. The contributions of federal ministers, including the prime minister, in this debate are also likely to increase; Matthew Guy’s Liberal opposition in Victoria is building its case for election on law and order issues.

And from the ABC, 3.1.2018

EXCERPT.......

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-01-03/african-migrants-face-unfair-stigma-as-gang-stoush-escalates/9300382

"Crime statistics show an overrepresentation of Sudanese-born and Kenyan-born offenders in some categories.

There was a sharp rise in Sudanese-born offenders involved in aggravated burglaries, from 20 in the 2014-15 financial year to 98 two years later, according to Victoria's Crime Statistics Agency.

However, the statistics also show that a Victorian is more than 25 times more likely to be seriously assaulted by someone born in Australia or New Zealand than someone born in Sudan or Kenya."

NOW, DEAR READER, any decent bean counter, having read just both excerpts above, will immediately detect the obfuscation, nay - the lie and misrepresentation, of facts.

Simply enough, the black Africans are 0.5% of the Victorian population of, say, around 6 million, which is roughly 30,000. The ABC warns us that: "Watch Out ..... Victorians are attacked by Aussies 25 times more frequently than they are assaulted by the nayce black chaps"!!! Oh Dear, all things supposedly being equal on these population statistics, we could expect attacks by native Aussies to be 200 times more prevalent than those by those nayce black chappies. See what I mean? It means the black chappies assault Victorians 8 times more than do native Aussies, yet the ABC wants us to beware those white Aussies.

I really can't be bothered analyzing Calla's confused crap, after all I'm not doing a treatise for a Masters here, so make a close examination of her sophistry for yourself. But, Hey Calla, wait for me after class because I want you to write 100 times: "I must not lie to the people"! This is not to mention her use of Mr. Left Lawyer Kelly to support her house of cards. Her comparison of black v. white crime boils down to false equivalence and relativism, if one cares to read between the lines, or even the lines themselves.

For their part, the ABC had a Mr. Yuo on to speak about the "non-gang" crimewave, but they couldn't have liked his condemnatory truth so, next day on the DRUM they had leftist legal champion ex-African-made-good-success-story [Ms Nyuon] to repeat the narrative that...

[1] There are no African gangs as these thugs are just Aussie kids now [so get over your 'black' prejudice], while at the same time telling us that.......

[2] These poor African kids suffered such trauma back home that,,,,,,,,

Oh Hell, see what I mean? It's a contradictive narrative. Worse, she seems to think that trauma experienced by these refugees is a "cause" to trash the new host country [ even though they came out as wee tykes and were, at the same time, born here ].

Let me not get started on the illogic of "deflection" whereby the narrative is switched to the name or nomenclature argument ...... are they loosely attracted groups, or stray happenstance gatherings, or GANGS [gasp]?! No! No!, they are NOT gangs, they assure us [so there's nothing to worry about]. Apex is defunct. "Menace to Society" is just a tag. Pooh, Pooh.

Excerpt.......

“We saw that very clearly with the Apex gang. Young kids would scrawl ‘Apex’ on a car that they vandalised and then it becomes linked to the broader narrative when really it’s just young kids. There’s no membership. It’s just kids scrawling tags.”

A South Sudanese youth worker, Nelly Yoa, disagrees. Writing in Fairfax Media, Yoa said he was “furious” to hear Crisp say there were no Sudanese gangs in Melbourne."

Let me wrap it up, the crap tires me. Name or no name, Gang or no gang, VICTORIA ........ YOU HAVE AN ETHNIC CRIME & ANTI-CULTURE PROBLEM.

from the Daily Mail article for further reading..........

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5230083/Lawyer-says-African-gang-violence-Australian-issue.html

FINALLY.........

NAMNOW #2