EVERYTHING YOU BELIEVE MAY BE WRONG

 

STATEMENT TO YOU, DEAR READERS of our blog and social media pages

YOUR WORLDVIEW MAY WELL HAVE BEEN INFLUENCED BY AN ELITE HEGEMONY and thus BE WRONG.

Our blog posts and social media posts are flavoured by Conservative Christian values. You may have noticed that we rail against the Western Imperialist System quite a bit, as exemplified by our criticism of support for Ukraine, the persecution of Christians and innocent citizens in Syria and Yemen, the starvation of children from Western imposed sanctions, the forever war actions and narratives, the government controls imposed on us plebs throughout the ‘pandemic’ along with the forced medical treatments and so on.

And yes, we have railed against leaders like Biden et al, ScoMo, BoJo, Macron, Trudeau, Adern and Albo……… the whole bluddy lot of them whether they are left or right.

Let’s get one thing straight.

In Australia, for example, true Conservative values have been destroyed gradually since Menzies. Successive leaders have destroyed our manufacturing of everything from Steel to shoes, from cars to clothing. These globalists signed our allegiances away to the U.N. and its affiliates from the old Lima Declaration right up until the present move to sign up to the WEF Pandemic Treaty. They have introduced school curricula to indoctrinate our future generation, including future leaders, into the anti-family globohomo narrative and in doing so THEY HAVE ABUSED OUR KIDS. The universities have been infiltrated by Hegelian and Marxist ideas in the Communist march through the institutions to indoctrinate young leaders into the gender fluidity paradigm, support the Alphabet Bloc to destroy marriage and family, to give rise to third wave feminism and to denigrate men as patriarchal extremists. And this is not to mention the promotion of importing foreign anti-Christian, anti-western, counter cultural migration that infects our media, for one thing, with anti-patriot ideals and counter culture methods to denigrate our heritage and traditional way of life.

I won’t even talk about America – the driving force in degeneration of standards that leads the ‘free world’ in corruption and pretence.

We do NOT live in a liberal democracy any more. It is not even Libertarianism on steroids. We now live in a Western world dominated by the globalist elites who destroy nationalism, patriotism, individualism and our sovereignty. WE WILL NOT STAY SILENT. We stand firmly with the humans of the world, whether they be in Alaska or Zanzibar, A to Z, Christian or not, especially with the defenceless in countries wracked by the Globalists’ wars and their sanctions that are designed to force regime change for sovereign countries to fall into line in the global financial and trade systems. THE WEST HAS BEEN INFILTRATED BY CULTURAL MARXISM OF THE TROTSKY VARIEY which defectors from the Soviet Union warned would happen to the West. It has happened and very few leaders have resisted except for the likes of Hungary, Poland somewhat and other Visgrad states, Brazil and some African states.

WHAT IS YOUR WORLDVIEW? Do we disrupt it by criticising what may appear to you as criticism of our valued Western idealism? If your concerns are with who gets married next on MAFS, or how much money the new government can put in your pocket, then we will leave you to it, with the hope that you give some consideration to our posts as well as the many other alternative sources that Big Tech, Big Pharma, Big Government, and Big Banks continually manage to censor with their labels of fake news and conspiracy theorists. We will continue to support sovereignty and stand against a Western hegemony that has been hijacked by an elite few who want us under the thumb of their new world order.

And we leave you with similar thoughts, better written sentiments, from another Australian columnist, Caitlin Johnson ……..

” … If you’ve publicly challenged the official narratives of the western political/media class about any major issue, you’ve probably noticed that people can get pretty upset about it.

Like, actually upset. Not mildly annoyed like you might get at someone who is saying something that is obviously false and stupid, but burning hot emotional like you’d get if you heard someone insulting your loved one. Or like someone insulting you personally.

That’s the most surprising thing, when you first start speaking about this stuff. Not that people don’t believe you or don’t agree with you; that’s to be expected when every screen in their lives is telling them one thing and you’re telling them something else. But that people actually get deeply emotionally invested in it.

That’s your first clue that there’s something else going on beneath the surface apart from what you’re being presented with. You’re not just arguing about Ukraine or China or Syria or whatever, you’re touching on a psychological third rail that’s being ferociously protected.

Many of the people you’ll run into online or in person who defend imperial narratives from your criticisms aren’t doing so because they believe the US-centralized empire is awesome and great, they’re doing so because it’s much more comfortable than confronting the possibility that their entire worldview is made of lies.

You’re not going to believe what I’m about to tell you https://t.co/XwFjK9EOyl pic.twitter.com/QRSalVfuKK

— The Oatmeal (@Oatmeal) May 2, 2017

There’s a great comic by The Oatmeal which explains the psychological defense mechanisms humans have in place to protect their worldview from information that could destabilize it. Because of our tendency to select for cognitive ease over cognitive challenge in order to conserve mental energy, we tend to be heavily biased against consciously helping new worldview-disrupting information get past those psychological defense mechanisms.

And it doesn’t get more worldview-disrupting than questioning mainstream consensus reality. Because on the other side of that investigation is the realization that pretty much everything you’ve been trained to believe about your society, your nation, your government and your world, is a lie.

This is often what people are really pushing back against when they get upset at someone who is being critical of official empire narratives. It’s not actually super important to them that everyone believe the correct things about their government or someone else’s government, it’s super important to them that the world as they know it not come to a crashing halt.

Because that’s what it is, as far as their experience and perception is concerned. A lucid seeing that their entire worldview is based on lies would feel like the end of their world, because in their experience it would be the end of the world they know.

Having your entire understanding of the world and how it works torn asunder is a kind of a death, because it’s the end of your secure knowing of what’s real. In a sense it’s the end of you, too. It’s the end of the person you were. It’s all illusory of course, but that’s the way it feels…….” tbc.

Caitlin’s full post is here > https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2022/06/02/people-who-defend-empire-narratives-are-really-just-defending-their-worldview-from-destruction/

AND A BOOK RECOMMENDED ON THE SAME THEME IS “EVERYTHING YOU BELIEVE IS WRONG”. https://www.amazon.com/Everything-Believe-Wrong-William-Briggs/dp/1087987156

William M. Briggs was born in Detroit at the height of its majesty. When he left, it went into the crapper. Coincidence? He later entered the Air Force and became Staff Sergeant Briggs. When he took off his stripes, the Soviet Union crumbled. Coincidence? He went to university and earned many letters after his name which wow the unthinking. After he graduated, they installed a Dean for Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity. Coincidence?He lived for many years on the isle of Manhattan during it brightest years. When he fled, the city’s Mayor instituted Vaccine Passports. Coincidence? Finally, he wrote this penetrating book. After you close it covers, you, dear reader, will find that you are based.Coincidence?

THE EU SANCTIFIES BLASPHEMY.

Jesus In Jeans.

IN SHORT:  A Lithuanian court fined the company responsible for depicting Our Lord and Our Lady in a clothing ad. [around $1000 Aud.], following a complaint from a Catholic group [there can’t be too many of those in Lithuania]. The company appealed to the EU court of Human Rights which subsequently over-ruled the Lithuanian court and ordered them to repay the company. Such is the totalitarian power of the EU that it can over-rule the self-determination of a sovereign state.

And readers will anticipate my next point: according to the EU the ad. is not inciting hate and religious symbology is up for grabs. So, why will NO country in the world permit even the public propagation of a benign image of Mohammed, let alone for advertising, satire or animation? Okay, that’s a rhetorical question as we all know why, but what’s good for the goose is obviously offensive to the gander.

Here is the article for those with too much time on their hands……….

from this mob: http://www.repubblica.it/esteri/2018/01/30/news/pubblicita_gesu_e_maria_lituania_strasburgo-187639238/?ref=RHPPLF-BH-I0-C8-P4-S1.8-T1

January 30, 2018

1,8mila

ROME – The European Court of Human Rights legitimizes and defends the use of religious symbols in advertising and condemns Lithuania for having fined a company that used Jesus and Mary on posters and the internet to sell clothes. According to the judges, the fine imposed for “offended public morality” violated the right to freedom of expression of the company.

The facts date back to 2012 when a Lithuanian company that produces clothes launches an advertising campaign using the photo of a man and a woman with a halo, he in jeans and tattooed, she with a white dress and a beaded necklace, accompanied by phrases “Jesus, what trousers!”, “Dear Mary, what dress!” and “Jesus and Mary, what do you wear!”.
The advertisements triggered a series of protests sent to the National Agency for the Defense of Consumer Rights.

The latter, after asking the opinion of the self-regulating body of the advertising specialists and the Lithuanian episcopal conference, concluded that the advertisements did not respect religion and therefore were a violation of public morals and imposed a fine of 580 euros on the company. .

In today’s ruling, which will become final within 3 months if the parties do not appeal, the judges affirm that the national authorities have a wide margin of maneuver on similar issues especially in cases involving a commercial use of religious symbols.

However, the prosecutors point out that the advertisements in question “do not appear to be gratuitous offensive or profane” and “do not incite hatred”, and therefore the authorities are required to provide relevant and sufficient reasons why they would be contrary to public morality. Instead in this case the reasons given by the authorities “are vague and do not explain with sufficient accuracy why the reference in advertisements to religious symbols was offensive”.

In particular, the Court criticizes the authorities for having judged that advertisements “promoted a lifestyle incompatible with the principles of a religious person” without explaining what the encouraged lifestyle was and how the photos and captions in question were favoring it. . The judges are also critical of the fact that the only religious group consulted to judge the case was the Catholic group.

The sentence states that the Court of Strasbourg considers that “freedom of expression is one of the essential foundations of a democratic society and one of the basic conditions for its progress and for the individual self-realization of each person”. It also “extends to ideas that shock, offend or disturb”. He also emphasizes that the Lithuanian authorities have held publicity contrary to public morality because they have used religious symbols “for superficial purposes”, “distorting their main purpose” and being “inappropriate”.

However, for the Court these findings are “vague and insufficient to explain why the reference to religious symbols in advertisements is offensive, if not for the fact that the purpose is not religious”. Moreover, for the judges, the images “do not seem gratuitous offensive or profane, nor do they incite hatred for reasons of faith or attack a religion in an abusive or gratuitous way”.

The court concludes that the local authorities have not “reached the right balance between the protection of public morals and the rights of religious people on the one hand, the right to freedom of expression of the company on the other”. The positions they expressed, he justified, “show that they have given

total priority to protect the sentiments of religious people, without taking into consideration the right to freedom of expression of the company. “Vilnius, therefore, will have to compensate the company with 580 euros.

LIES, DAMN LIES and THE LEFTIST PRESS.

AFRICAN GANG VIOLENCE is skewed by mainstream media to avoid racial profiling and to fit the cultural marxist narrative which hails diversity through the immigration of anti-cultures.

From the Guardian, 3.1.2018, written by Calla Wahlquist:

[Full article: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/jan/03/is-melbourne-in-the-grip-of-african-gangs-the-facts-behind-the-lurid-headlines?utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=GU+Today+AUS+v1+-+AUS+morning+mail+callout&utm_term=259008&subid=21496537&CMP=ema_632]


EXCERPT..........

What do the statistics say?

Reading the crime statistics is difficult because there are a number of factors at play.

On the face of it, Sudanese immigrants are over-represented in the crime statistics. About 1.5% of criminal offenders in Victoria are Sudanese, the Victorian Crime Statistics Agency (CSA) told a federal parliamentary inquiry on migrant settlement outcomes, while the Sudanese and South Sudanese communities together make up just 0.5% of the state’s total population.

The majority of crimes in Victoria, unsurprisingly, are committed by people born in Australia. The second-highest cohort were New Zealanders, which are the fourth-largest migrant group in Victoria.

The over-representation is a misconception and a misconstruction.

Anthony Kelly, Fitzroy Kensington Community Legal Centre

However, by pulling out particular offences you can highlight certain groups. For example, in charges of riot and affray, people born in Sudan made up 6% of all recorded offenders, compared with 71.5% born in Australia and 5.2% born in New Zealand.

Prepare to see these statistics manipulated in many ways, by both sides of politics, as the state election draws closer. The contributions of federal ministers, including the prime minister, in this debate are also likely to increase; Matthew Guy’s Liberal opposition in Victoria is building its case for election on law and order issues.

And from the ABC, 3.1.2018

EXCERPT.......

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-01-03/african-migrants-face-unfair-stigma-as-gang-stoush-escalates/9300382

"Crime statistics show an overrepresentation of Sudanese-born and Kenyan-born offenders in some categories.

There was a sharp rise in Sudanese-born offenders involved in aggravated burglaries, from 20 in the 2014-15 financial year to 98 two years later, according to Victoria's Crime Statistics Agency.

However, the statistics also show that a Victorian is more than 25 times more likely to be seriously assaulted by someone born in Australia or New Zealand than someone born in Sudan or Kenya."

NOW, DEAR READER, any decent bean counter, having read just both excerpts above, will immediately detect the obfuscation, nay  -  the lie and misrepresentation, of facts.

Simply enough, the black Africans are 0.5% of the Victorian population of, say, around 6 million, which is roughly 30,000. The ABC warns us that: "Watch Out ..... Victorians are attacked by Aussies 25 times more frequently than they are assaulted by the nayce black chaps"!!! Oh Dear, all things supposedly being equal on these population statistics, we could expect attacks by native Aussies to be 200 times more prevalent than those by those nayce black chappies. See what I mean? It means the black chappies assault Victorians 8 times more than do native Aussies, yet the ABC wants us to beware those white Aussies.

I really can't be bothered analyzing Calla's confused crap, after all I'm not doing a treatise for a Masters here, so make a close examination of her sophistry for yourself. But, Hey Calla, wait for me after class because I want you to write 100 times: "I must not lie to the people"! This is not to mention her use of Mr. Left Lawyer Kelly to support her house of cards. Her comparison of black v. white crime boils down to false equivalence and relativism, if one cares to read between the lines, or even the lines themselves.

For their part, the ABC had a Mr. Yuo on to speak about the "non-gang" crimewave, but they couldn't have liked his condemnatory truth so, next day on the DRUM they had leftist legal champion ex-African-made-good-success-story [Ms Nyuon] to repeat the narrative that...

[1] There are no African gangs as these thugs are just Aussie kids now [so get over your 'black' prejudice], while at the same time telling us that.......

[2] These poor African kids suffered such trauma back home that,,,,,,,, 

Oh Hell, see what I mean? It's a contradictive narrative. Worse, she seems to think that trauma experienced by these refugees is a "cause" to trash the new host country [ even though they came out as wee tykes and were, at the same time, born here ].

Let me not get started on the illogic of "deflection" whereby the narrative is switched to the name or nomenclature argument ...... are they loosely attracted groups, or stray happenstance gatherings, or GANGS [gasp]?!  No! No!, they are NOT gangs, they assure us [so there's nothing to worry about]. Apex is defunct. "Menace to Society" is just a tag. Pooh, Pooh.

Excerpt.......

“We saw that very clearly with the Apex gang. Young kids would scrawl ‘Apex’ on a car that they vandalised and then it becomes linked to the broader narrative when really it’s just young kids. There’s no membership. It’s just kids scrawling tags.”

A South Sudanese youth worker, Nelly Yoa, disagrees. Writing in Fairfax Media, Yoa said he was “furious” to hear Crisp say there were no Sudanese gangs in Melbourne."

Let me wrap it up, the crap tires me. Name or no name, Gang or no gang, VICTORIA ........ YOU HAVE AN ETHNIC CRIME & ANTI-CULTURE PROBLEM.

from the Daily Mail article for further reading..........

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5230083/Lawyer-says-African-gang-violence-Australian-issue.html

FINALLY.........

The Child Brainwashers.

SOME QUOTES from "Educators" responsible for the "Safe Schools Anti-Bullying Program" in Schools, developed at La Trobe University in the Dept: ARC-Sexual Health Studies [nothing to do with scholastic expertise in anti-bullying].


GARY DOWSETT: [Professor and Assist. Director, ARCSHS, http://www.latrobe.edu.au/arcshs/staff/staff-profile?uname=GWDowsett] 

"First, we have three legal/social questions  to win: custody right for gay men and lesbians; the legal rights of paedophiles and their young lovers; and finally the sexual rights of children as a whole. Second, we have three issues within the homosexual movement  and community: the support gay men provide the women’s movement and in our alternative child rearing practices and arrangements;..."

See: https://sydneytrads.com/2016/03/20/gary-dowsett/

ROZ WARD: [Degreed in Gender Studies and co-writer of the Safe Schools Program. No teaching qualifications].

"“LBGTI oppression and hetronormativity are woven into the fabric of capitalism […] This push to fit people into these physical and social gender constructs that promote heterosexuality is still incredibly strong and reinforced through the judicial system, through the medical, you know, all of medicine, the media and all social institutions […] Only Marxism provides both the theory and the practice of genuine human liberation […] The left historically and practically has been the key driver for the struggles for LGBTI rights […] Marxism offers the hope and the strategy needed to create a world where human sexuality, gender and how we relate to our bodies can blossom in extraordinarily new and amazing ways that we can only try to imagine today […] Alongside sexism, homophobia and transphobia both serve to break the spirits of ordinary people, to consume our thoughts, to make us accept the status quo and for us to keep living or aspiring to live, or feel like we should live, in small social units and families, where we must reproduce and take responsibility for those people in those units.’’

"“Safe Schools Coalition is about supporting gender and sexual diversity. It’s not about celebrating diversity. It’s not about stopping bullying. It’s about gender and sexual diversity. It’s about same sex attraction. It’s about being transgender. It’s about being lesbian, gay, bisexual, say the words: transgender, intersex. It’s not just about being nice to everyone, everyone’s great.”

" “Now we just need to get rid of the racist Australian flag on top of state parliament and get a red one up there and my work is done.” 

Anti-bullying campaigner Roz Ward confronts a pro-Trump demonstrator at anti-Trump rally organised by the Monash Student Association on November 12. Picture: Kenji Wardenclyffe/Wardenclyffe PhotographySource:Supplied 

Prof. STEVEN ANGELIDES: [http://www.latrobe.edu.au/arcshs/staff/staff-profile?uname=SAngelides]

"...However, all later choices remain somehow based on the parental prototypes. According to the 'enigmatic signifier' theory of Jean Laplanche, the child is seduced by the mother, more particular by her total persona and thus also by her sexuality (Angelides 2003). It is difficult to acknowledge this openly, however, in the unconsciousness there remains a reservoir of full sensual love between parents and their children. ..."

OUR TAX DOLLAR FUNDING CULTURAL MARXIST INDOCTRINATION OF FUTURE GENERATIONS

What Now For Kids?

My wife and I had just reached the ripe old age of twenty-three with a two month old baby when we applied to foster two Aboriginal boys to enable them to attend technical courses, since they hailed from remote country towns. The interview process conducted by Government agents was extensive and largely based on our views regarding family values and our personal worldview. Needless to say that our traditional values impressed. [And the two lads were an absolute joy].

Within a year I had joined the Government workforce and was in possession of a warrant that certified me as acting for the Minister of Indigenous [Native] Welfare and I was hiring staff myself to assist in the operation of an Aboriginal hostel, thus I was employing couples based on the same values that have evolved through the Christian ethos. But, a hostel is a different proposition to the out-of-home cottage system that I managed seven years later whereby surrogate parents were given a house and any number of Aboriginal children to care for. Such children came from broken homes or were orphaned. Whilst run under the auspices of a Christian denomination, cottage parents did not need to belong to that denomination but had to aspire to the same values of marriage and family as in the previous examples.

The priority for the hiring of cottage parents was definitive  -  one might say it was discriminatory  -  and discriminated in favor of [1] stable married Aboriginals who supported the Christian ethos,  [2] stable married couples of any nationality who supported the Christian ethos,  [3] single applicants who supported the Christian ethos. A good interviewer can determine the worldview of applicants as there were many factors to be considered, but that's the nutshell. There was no question that in the government-run hostel as well as for the private cottage system, the premium care to be provided for kids in the absence of the ultimate pre-eminent care of natural parents was a stable couple providing both mother and father figures. That I hired some single cottage parents was by necessity due to lack of married applicants. In one case, a single Aboriginal woman was given a baby and two small children and provided wonderful care. While she could not be faulted, the absence of a father figure was not ideal.

That was then. This is now, and it is the "now" of changes to the marriage laws which will not allow for discrimination as to gender or sexuality. Parliament will now proceed to debate just which exemptions will apply to wedding services, to free speech, to the hiring of carers, to conscientious objectors and so on. But it is not just what will be framed in legislation that is of concern  -  it is also the ethos that will pervade all things that have to do with children; viz., surrogacy, adoption, fostering, carers, babysitters, educators, medical care and treatments, unisex toilets/change rooms and the like. Already many serious problems have arisen in countries where same sex marriage has become law.

Why?

Australia just voted to burden itself with a new host of problems because  -Discrimination! That is just another term that the neo-modernist left have hijacked to become obnoxious; much like so many other terms. We discriminate dozens of times each day and through life to both increase our quality of life and to even save our lives: what shall I eat to maintain optimum health; which school is best for my kids; which doctor, which route to take, which babysitter, etc, etc? Surely you would not discriminate against a newly-released criminal who applied to house-sit or babysit. Would you? And yet we hand over our children to those really awful people who have designed gender fluidity school programs. Already in play is adoption of kids by same-sex parents who deprive them of one or more natural parents with the excuse that such parents are as capable of love as any natural parent. That goes back to my single Aboriginal surrogate parent who gave her charges much love  -  while it worked nicely, that situation ought not become the pre-eminent standard. But it will become equated with the care given in a nuclear family, and the non-discriminatory premise built in to same sex marriage brings with it the policy of never discriminating against adopters, fosterers, carers and so on. Would I now be forced to employ a 'transgender' female as a housemother for the girls in a hostel? Why not even a male? Were I that government agent who interviewed us to foster two boys but now found myself vetting a couple  -  one of which is a trans male and her/his partner is a transhuman, I will not be permitted to discriminate against them on the basis of their preferred gender or identity, since they have now legally married.

Do you think I am exaggerating? Here are some of the 300 articles I found where those who rejected trans and same sex marriage were either refused adoption or were prosecuted for their beliefs. [ that's 300 articles and none refer to prosecutions of Christians who refuse to service a wedding....... there are plenty of those too].

Forgive them Father for they know not what they have done.

Christians who reject transgenderism banned from adoption ...

https://www.lifesitenews.com/.../state-agencys-new-rules-accept- transgenderism-or-face-ban-from-working-with

Jun 1, 2017 ... Christians who reject transgenderism banned from adoption, working ... all employees and volunteers who cannot in good conscience support and ... added, “Denying people of ... faith the opportunity to foster or adopt children ...

Ontario passes 'totalitarian' bill allowing gov't to take kids from ...

https://www.lifesitenews.com/.../breaking-ontario-passes-totalitarian-bill- allowing-govt-to-take-kids-from-c

Jun 1, 2017 ... “The implication is that intervention should not be presumed to be ... to discriminate against Christians who want to adopt or foster children.

'Totalitarian': Ontario gov't bill makes it easier to seize children from ...

https://www.lifesitenews.com/.../totalitarian-ontario-govt-bill-makes-it-easier- to-seize-children-from-chris

Jan 25, 2017 ... “These are gestapo-like tactics, and I can't believe we're witnessing it unfold in the ... Bill discriminates against Christianswanting to adopt. Parents who are seeking to adopt or foster but who oppose gender theory and gender ...

Liberals now claim Christian parents are dangerous. This is an ...

https://www.lifesitenews.com/.../liberals-now-claim-christian-parents-are- dangerous.-this-is-an-existential

4 days ago ... This is an existential threat we can't ignore ... florists, property owners, and adoption agencies finding themselves to be the targets of gay ... And worse: Christian parents and foster parents are increasingly finding themselves ...

New law: Christian adoption agencies won't be forced to give kids to ...

https://www.lifesitenews.com/.../new-law-christian-adoption-agencies-wont- be-forced-to-give-kids-to-gay-coup

Jun 16, 2017 ... HB 3859, the Freedom to Serve Children Act, allows faith-based adoption and foster care organizations to receive state funding without fear of ...

Petition calls for repeal of 'totalitarian' bill allowing children to be ...

https://www.lifesitenews.com/.../petition-calls-for-repeal-of-totalitarian-bill- allowing-children-to-be-take

Jun 5, 2017 ... 'Make no mistake, Bill 89 is a grave threat to Christians and all ... who disagree with that agenda from fostering or adopting children. ... “[Y]ou can't remove a kid because the parent disagrees with the fact that a child is gay.

Liberal bill empowers gvmt to take kids from Ontario parents who ...

https://www.lifesitenews.com/.../liberal-bill-empowers-gvmt-to-take-kids- from-ontario-parents-who-dont-accep

Mar 14, 2017 ... ... from fostering or adopting children, according to an ARPA analysis. ... That “ implies that Children's Aid Society intervention should not be ...

ACLU sues Michigan for allowing adoption agencies to refuse same ...

https://www.lifesitenews.com/.../aclu-sues-michigan-for-allowing-adoption- agencies-to-refuse-same-sex-couple

Sep 22, 2017 ... Christian agencies across the nation have closed over LGBTQI anti- discrimination ... Other foster and adoptionagencies in San Francisco and ...

British agency ignores family's wishes, places 5-year-old Christian in ...

https://www.lifesitenews.com/.../british-agency-ignores-familys-wishes-pushes -5-year-old-christian-into-two

Aug 28, 2017 ... Foster parents are paid up to £474 ($612.59 US) a month per child ... supportive family homes to children who are unable to live with their birth ...

Texas House votes: adoption agencies won't be forced to give kids ...

https://www.lifesitenews.com/.../texas-house-advances-bill-to-protect-agencies -from-forced-adoptions-by-gays

May 11, 2017 ... He said that in light of Texas' “broken” foster care system, giving legal ... The bill also allows religious exemption from anti-Christian activities or ...