SARS-CoV-2 Is an Unrestricted Bioweapon: A Truth Revealed through Uncovering a Large-Scale, Organized Scientific Fraud
Yan, Li-Meng;
Kang, Shu;
Guan, Jie;
Hu, Shanchang
Two possibilities should be considered for the origin of
SARS-CoV-2: natural evolution or laboratory creation. In our earlier
report titled “Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting
Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and
Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route”, we disproved the
possibility of SARS-CoV-2 arising naturally through evolution and
instead proved that SARS-CoV-2 must have been a product of laboratory
modification. Despite this and similar efforts, the laboratory creation
theory continues to be downplayed or even diminished. This is
fundamentally because the natural origin theory remains supported by
several novel coronaviruses published after the start of the outbreak.
These viruses (the RaTG13 bat coronavirus, a series of pangolin
coronaviruses, and the RmYN02 bat coronavirus) reportedly share high
sequence homology with SARS-CoV-2 and have altogether constructed a
seemingly plausible pathway for the natural evolution of SARS-CoV-2.
Here, however, we use in-depth analyses of the available data and
literature to prove that these novel animal coronaviruses do not exist
in nature and their sequences have been fabricated. In addition, we also
offer our insights on the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 may have
originated naturally from a coronavirus that infected the Mojiang
miners.
Revelation of these virus fabrications renders the natural origin
theory unfounded. It also strengthens our earlier assertion that
SARS-CoV-2 is a product of laboratory modification, which can be created
in approximately six months using a template virus owned by a
laboratory of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). The fact that data
fabrications were used to cover up the true origin of SARS-CoV-2 further
implicates that the laboratory modification here is beyond simple
gain-of-function research.
The scale and the coordinated nature of this scientific fraud
signifies the degree of corruption in the fields of academic research
and public health. As a result of such corruption, damages have been
made both to the reputation of the scientific community and to the
well-being of the global community.
Importantly, while SARS-CoV-2 meets the criteria of a bioweapon
specified by the PLA, its impact is well beyond what is conceived for a
typical bioweapon. In addition, records indicate that the unleashing of
this weaponized pathogen should have been intentional rather than
accidental. We therefore define SARS-CoV-2 as an Unrestricted Bioweapon and the current pandemic a result of Unrestricted Biowarfare.
We further suggest that investigations should be carried out on the
suspected government and individuals and the responsible ones be held
accountable for this brutal attack on the global community.
[The 33 page Report is available by clicking link[s] below, or on the source url at the top]
Opinions about the Covid pandemic vary greatly. This post relates to the line of thought that the Covid-19 virus does not exist. Among those claiming this is Jon Rappoport who has scores of blog posts on his web site. This, below, is merely his latest, and I post it since it is not merely supposition but refers to the CDC official site itself. First, there is a video on what Jon has picked up [click on the facebook link shown]. Second, there is Jon's own post.
ANOTHER key architect of the COVID PCR test had no coronavirus; the whole fake COVID house is falling down.
“We know exactly what we’re doing, but we have no virus available.”
by Jon Rappoport
October 13, 2020
I’ve been exposing the fact that the CDC, in July of this year, admitted, in a document, that…
They didn’t have the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It wasn’t “available.”
This means they couldn’t obtain an isolated specimen of the virus. There is only one reason why.
The virus hasn’t been isolated. And THAT means no one has proved it exists.
And now, I’ve discovered ANOTHER key document. This one apparently
formed the basis for the first PCR test aimed at detecting the COVID
virus all over the world.
READ WHAT THIS STUDY SAYS. These quotes should be engraved in stone
above the entrance to a museum dedicated to the history of medical
fraud.
“We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use
in public health laboratory settings without having virus material
available.”
TRANSLATION: We want to develop a test to detect the new COVID virus without having the virus.
“Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its
design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS
coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”
TRANSLATION: We HAVE developed a diagnostic test to detect the new
COVID virus. We ASSUME this new virus is closely related to an older
coronavirus. We ASSUME we know HOW it is related. We ASSUME, because
we don’t have the new COVID virus. Therefore, all our assumptions are
made out of nothing. Actually, we have no proof there is a new
coronavirus.
“The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from SARS-CoV.”
TRANSLATION: Our new test to detect the new virus? We don’t have the
new virus. We’ve never observed it. We can’t study it directly.
There is no proof it exists. But we will use the test to detect it.
Those quotes from the study are astounding. A diagnostic test for
the virus, but there is no virus. No standard against which to compare
the reliability of the test.
The authors blithely assume they can somehow infer that the virus
exists in the first place, without having an isolated specimen.
Then they assume they can understand the structure of the virus that isn’t there.
The virus isn’t there. It has NOT been isolated. It has NOT been
separated out from other material. Therefore, it has not been observed
and its existence has not been proved.
And yet, the test which these authors have developed is launched, all
over the world, to detect that virus; to promote the unproven notion
that there is a pandemic; to form the basis for counting COVID case
numbers; and ultimately to justify all the lockdowns which have crashed
the global economy and destroyed millions upon millions of lives.
A great deal of confusion has been created, because scientists are
now talking about the “new virus” as if they understand its structure
and sequence. No. They’ve INTERPRETED that genetic structure. And
once they’ve made their interpretations, they gibber about what it
means.
It’s like this. A man has a very thick steel vault. He clams there
is a pile of treasure inside. But no one can open the door to the
vault. People show up with all sorts of fancy instruments, and they
make indirect measurements. They then issue very authoritative-sounding
statements about what is inside the vault.
But no one can get in there. This is a magic vault, you see. You
can’t drill into it. You can’t blow it up. But in its vicinity, all
sorts of hustlers are gathered. And they PONTIFICATE. They BLOVIATE.
They wave their credentials. Reporters interview them. Governments
follow their recommendations.
And that’s all it is. It’s that kind of party.
There is also confusion about what the word “isolate” means, when it
comes to viruses. SAYING you have isolated a virus doesn’t mean you
have.
It may mean you THINK you have the virus inside a mess of material
which contains many different genetic sequences and all manner of
cellular debris and who knows what.
Some scientists will claim “a lesser amount of mess” entitles them to state they’ve “isolated” the virus.
Other scientists will claim that because they can grow, in a dish,
what they BELIEVE to be the virus, this is “proof” that the virus
exists.
They’re wrong.
Still other scientists will say that, in a dish in a lab, they “have
the virus growing”, and they know it, because the virus is destroying
certain cells in the soup in the dish. But in this soup, there are
various added chemicals, and those chemicals could easily be doing the
cell-killing.
So they are wrong, too.
As the late independent researcher David Crowe has written: “And the
word ‘isolation’ has been so debased by virologists it means nothing
(e.g. adding impure materials to a cell culture and seeing cell death is
[as] ‘isolation’).”
This is why something called real-world experiments were introduced
into science. Experiments that were forced out of the lab into the
arena where actual humans live.
In my last article,
I described exactly the kind of experiment that should have been
initiated five minutes after scientists claimed there was an “outbreak
in China.” It’s a large scale study involving humans who were diagnosed
with the “epidemic illness.” Tissue samples would be taken from 500 of
these patients and correctly analyzed via electron microscope
photography.
But studies of that dimension and precision don’t interest scientists
who live in the lab. Such studies are too dangerous. There is every
chance that, in the harsh glare of sunlight, all their warnings about a
vast pandemic will be shown to be false. False and ridiculous. Absurd.
And insane.
These “experts” don’t want to take that chance.
So they fiddle and diddle in their labs, and they make wild claims based on nothing, on NO VIRUS.
For them, there is no such thing as NO VIRUS. There must always be a
virus. They will build strings of thought that circle around and meet
up and shake hands and justify themselves, BY DEFINITION.
When all is said and done, that is what they are playing at. “We
make all the definitions, and therefore we can conclude anything we want
to conclude. And call it science.”
That’s what’s going on.
I see the con and I’m pointing out the con.
I’m telling scientists who are honest to call it a con, too.
Empty out the house of modern virology; open the windows and let the
fresh air in; and then we’ll be living in a far better world.
And, oh yes, prosecute these researchers who devised a test for the
virus they never found. Prosecute them for crimes against humanity, and
send them to prison.
