Tuesday, 6 February 2018

RITUAL SEX ABUSE. I said:”RITUAL”


Today’s News article from Australia’s ABC reports:
“New South Wales Police have charged seven people with 127 offences over the alleged sexual and physical abuse of three boys between 2014 and 2016 which included “blood rituals”.
The charges have been laid against people linked to a performing arts school in regional NSW, the ABC has confirmed.”
The exterior of a brick building Circus equipment.
The story can be read at the link, but I will leave further comment as it is yet to go to court.
No doubt many have read about such things as Pizzagate which morphed into Pedogate, the accusations of Hollywood Illuminati RSA and paedophilia, Hillary Clinton child trafficking allegations, the Podesta brothers Satanic artworks and the ties to Marina Abromavic’s spirit cooking. In my own backyard have been the allegations in Parliament of high level paedophile rings as well as the case of Fiona Barrett. In England, the child sex rings among elites is documented.
So, can we finally skip accusations of hyperbole when investigators bring these matters up? Can we stop dismissing these cases as conspiracy theories?  Will the public stop tuning out as soon as MK ULTRA or MONARCH is mentioned? An acceptable reason for disinterest is distatste, because these things are horrible and often too much for the mind to bear.
The reason I titled this post in part: I said: “RITUAL”, is because that is what we are talking about. Ritual: 1. an established or set procedure, code, form, system, etc., for a religious or other rite. 2. the act of following set forms of worship.  [Macquarie Dictionary]. Can we also cut to the chase of whom or what is the object of worship without the involvement of tin foil hats? It ain’t Jesus Christ, is it? If every object of worship is not Christ, then it is anti-Christ, and that means Satan or any other name he goes by. But do let’s keep our shirts on, for this is not implying that a non-Christian is Satanic. Ritual as part of RSA is not akin to the frivolous rituals of a sports club or Apexians. Rituals of worship at a Catholic mass, say, are a sacrament which is a “sacred sign” of inter-reaction with a Divine Spirit God and an effective reality. In the same way, a Black Mass is intended to unite one with a Spirit too  –  Satan. Ritual in RSA are acts performed for the same reason  –  as worship carried out in obedience, to seek a union with, or to appease the spiritual entity known as Satan. Note that the case advised today in NSW involves RSA. It is not simply child abuse, not simply sexual molestation, not just pedophilia. No, it is RITUAL, alleging acts committed as worship of a Being. Paedophilia, abuse, rape and so on are committed for the intrinsic ‘value’ of sexual satisfaction or power or revenge or whatever. RSA may well contain these intrinsic elements, but the main feature is it’s Satanically evil formulaic.
The Devil has had many forms assigned to him and many names, but such history cannot be addressed here. That said, the Devil’s most modern personna is BAPHOMET.
From an article at BBC 1.8.2015………..
“The best-known modern image of Baphomet was drawn in 1856 by the French occultist Eliphas Levi, in his book Transcendental Magic: Its Doctrine and Ritual.
He envisaged a winged hermaphrodite with a torch between his horns and a pentagram on his forehead.
Its arms bore the Latin words SOLVE (separate) and COAGULA (join together) – the powers of “binding and loosing” usurped from God.
Levi’s drawing was the inspiration for the Satanic Temple’s new monument.
“It contains all these binary opposites – above and below, part animal, part human. Male and female,” says Greaves.
“It embodies opposites and celebrates contrasts.”
Two fingers on the right hand point up and two on the left hand point down, meaning “as above, so below”.
These words and the accompanying gesture are familiar to occultists. They are drawn from the ancient works of Hermes Trismegistus, whose writings became popular during the Renaissance and Reformation.”

Levi's Baphomet
Statue
Immediately above, this was displayed in Detroit, minus breasts to avoid the deliberate association with gender fluidity. The bronze statue is nearly 9ft tall and depicts a winged hermaphrodite known as Baphomet, flanked by two smiling children. It cost $100,000 (£64,000) to make and hundreds of Satanists turned out to see it unveiled. Baphomet is androgynous, and deliberately so. The inclusion of children in the above is also deliberate and quite telling and disturbing.
Let’s be clear. A pedophile or rapist commits evil acts. They rarely commit offences because they are active devil worshipers. And yet, society cannot cry “evil” and divorce the influence of the One who is personified Evil. I am going to make a claim that will outrage many [but not those who are familiar with these matters]. The Devil influences actions where his influence is unconscious. Normally good men and women give in to temptations. We all do. Sometimes our sins are unconsciously inspired by evil entities without our conscious submission to an acknowledged evil entity, even though our sins are committed with our free will and assent. My claim then is that behind the modern spate of promotion of gender fluidity, transgenderism, homosexual propaganda, the demolition of manhood and the like, lies Baphomet. Quickly reach for your logic and reason cap, for I am not claiming that, say, a transgender is a devil worshiper. A genuine percentage, albeit a very small one, have real and unwelcome issues with their sex and with same sex attraction. There is absolutely no sin involved in a feeling, an emotion, gender dysphoria, same sex attraction, or in any temptation; not until one’s conscious actions choose a disordered path. For example, hating evil is beneficial, but killing your daughter’s abuser is wrong. But my claim does not come down to individual cases. I make the claim in a metaphysical sense, that Satan’s agenda is behind the modern phenomena of the surge of the LGBT agenda to foister sexualizing education programs on our children to see a new class of hedonist adults who will be societal leaders and who will in turn ensure permissiveness in their own children. This agenda has been warned about by many, and it is the agenda to destroy society’s most basic unit: the Family. Thereby will the cultural Marxist agenda be realized. Too extreme? Let’s hear what Fr. Dwight Longenecker says………..
”
The winged goat headed figure not only has male genitalia, but breasts.
Furthermore, when you look closely you’ll see that the beast has two arms–one male and one female.
On the arms are the Latin words “Solve” and “Coagula”. These mean “Separate” and “Come Together”. These are occult words for the task of the alchemist who takes what is integrated and natural–breaks it and then puts it back together in a new (and perverted) way.
This is precisely what Satan is doing at this time with human sexuality. Through feminism, homosexualism , trans genderism, gender confusion and “identifying” as whatever gender a person wants the distinctions between male and female are being broken and put back together however it is desired.
The celebration of “Caitlyn” Jenner–indeed the enforced celebration and constant publicity about this “transitioning” is a visual illustration of what is going on.
The latest rumor is that “Caitlyn” is going to bare all for a Playboy centerfold. Can this be happening? American men are being set up to lust after another man who has artificially become a woman?” [Patheos. July27, 2015]
Well, I suppose a priest would say that. Let’s hear from the author who wrote “The Book Of Baphomet”…….
“This principle of Androgyny is fed as much by the lived experience of unique, individual Androgynous people as it is by the realm of aspirational metaphysics. It as much as about the creativity of the Radical Faery and Butch Lesbian as it about Adam Kadmon or Ardhanarisvara. For me, to work with this form of Androgyny means to acknowledge both a dialectical process that seeks to capture the world of ideal forms, while at the same time experiencing a dialogical reality in which a multitude of positions need to be held together without a necessary resolution.”
So that I don’t end up writing a book myself on this, let me abbreviate this post by saying that I did not come to this subject lately. My years of researching New Age has included this area. [Funnily enough, the three doyens of modern Satanism are quite angry that Baphomet has been adopted by the New Agers, that’s Anton Levy, Helena Blavatsky and Aleister Crowley. Their bios are on Wikipedia and here’s an interesting video for further info….]

There is so much evidence for my claim but my post, as I said, would be more book-length than blog-length. I will leave some links below for further information, and these references are from the proponents of satanism, new age, LGBT and gender fluidity promoters, rather than from condemners.
See also…….
“The student of Thelema often jumps to the conclusion that they are hermaphroditic in thought, similar to disregarding the orthodox understandings of True Will before they seek to find their True Will. It serves no practical use for the aspirant to perceive himself as Baphomet before understanding the nature and powers of his own being. Hidden within his/her subconscious mind are often repressed emotions regarding the gender and sexual orientation he/she was prescribed early in childhood.” https://alephnull429.wordpress.com/tag/gender/ [NOTE that Thelema is of the OTO, Ordo Temple Orientis, a member of which is suing a friend of mine, and I will post a blog when her trial is over].
So, they are a small proportion of my references which I hope have been informative.
AMDG

Friday, 2 February 2018

CROSSING THE JORDAN PETERSON.



Prof. Jordan Peterson, psychologist, has become flavor of the decade for the conservative political right with his arguments of reason and logic that decimate the wooly theories of the prog-libs and cultural Marxist post modernists. The catalyst for his rise to prominence on social media was his refusal to indulge in the enforced terming of pronouns for the gender fluid. While in reality there are plenty of such sensible commentators about, it is to his good fortune that he has broken through into the public arena where others remain in relative obscurity  –  it’s not as if reason and logic have just been discovered  –  and those others are considered by the mainstream to be far right nutters or even religious nerds who are not willing disciples of the god of Cool. And that,  – Cool  – is the light in which Peterson is apparently being seen by, of all demographic groups, generation Z. A good thing as far as it goes.
The reasonable average Joe and even your mildly activist keyboard warrior knows bullshit when he or she sees it, but articulating their position so often falls short. Enter the appealing person of Jordan Peterson who has taken up their cudgel. Up to very recent times his crusade on behalf of the bourgeoisie has concentrated on social mores and public policy such as free speech, feminism, gender theory, culture, migration policies etc. But, of late, the revered professor has begun to make public his personal views on religion. He gives every appearance of being on a spiritual journey without defining his beliefs dogmatically. And it would appear that he is taking his cult following with him [and this is not to imply that he is aligned to, or starting a cult, for I could well have said his ‘fan base’]. Should these followers travel the whole journey with him and enjoy the benefit from a resultant truth which is Christian [for he is touted as being a Christian], then that ought be a good result. Peterson believes in God, in Jesus, the resurrection conditionally, and the bible for a start. Why then should I express concern?
Co-incidentally, I posted a YouTube video on facebook just yesterday of Peterson talking with Ben Shapiro and Dave Rubin and my comment displayed a concern that I had. As I put it, “He appears to be trying to re-invent the metaphysical wheel, and has not yet found his own answer to the perennial question of ‘Why Is There Not Nothing?'” I would have thought a champion of reasoned thinking might have come to some basic answer, albeit that he already is said to have faith, notwithstanding that, as I am too aware, faith and knowledge are developmental and beg to grow. I suggested too that he appeared to be much influenced by Jung and de Chardin.  As circumstance would have it, last night my reading material included articles from The Federalist, and this article was one:
I quote:
“This, combined with his rhetorical approach and that his Canadian accent affects just enough of the exotic to tantalize Americans who assume profundity in such things, is exactly the stuff of a YouTube sensation. If that makes Christianity cool again, or helps skeptical Christians feel good and intellectual about the faith, that can’t be a bad thing. I guess.
More likely, however, Peterson is fostering our cultural Gnosticism. Consider his understanding of God, what he calls his first hypothesis: God is the abstraction of a human ideal formalized over millions of years of human development in the myths and teachings of any religion. Does an actual transcendent deity exist? Peterson leaves this “floating up in the air” (his words, in lecture one), something unfit for rational investigation.”
[The article itself, and the author, begs for critique. But I will leave that for now].
The article is lengthy and I found it disturbing as Gnosticism is antithetical to Christianity. Peterson is also an evolutionist of the type that denies the Catholic Christian doctrine that God created two sentient beings who sought the “knowledge” to be as gods and their sin bastardized the perfection of all things that God had created and so required redemption to be restored as a New Earth as we find in Christ. I fear that Peterson is going the New Age road of the “proud” who ignore the tenets established over thousands of years through Tradition, Revelation and the Bible and embarking on Teilhard’s road of “knowing the essence of God” as Adam sought to do, via the Cosmic Theology of either or both the collective unconscious or collective consciousness that culminates in the “Omega Point”. He is entitled to ruminate and embark on his journey but it is of concern that he is taking many thousands down a dubious road to a belief system that leads away from the very God being sought. I do wish he would stick with social commentary and not publicize his esoteric beliefs.
The substance of Gnosticism and the theories of Jung, of whom he is a devotee, are too much for this article but I refer readers to search the personalities and beliefs mentioned, and I recommend the article link above from The Federalist. Should a reader do so then I also refer him to look at the bio of Richard Noll too. Noll was a critic of Jung’s theories and wrote a relevant book. Prof. Peterson launched an attack on Noll, claiming that the book cover had Nazi images. It did not, and Peterson later issued an apology, so our hero is very touchy about his affinity to Jung.
We can know God here and now in various ways, experientially, by Grace, from Jesus words and actions, through prayer and so on. But, the Divine essence is indeterminate for humans, and were it not then there would be no need for faith or even maybe free will. Traditionally, theology concerning the knowability of God has been to define Him by what He is not, and somewhat by what He is, and it is only pride that thinks God can be discovered through esoteric knowledge. The temptation to eat of the tree of knowledge was too much for Adam, and it is still insistent for us. My hope is that a seemingly good man finds joy and peace for his soul in the truths of Jesus, and comes to know the efficacy of God’s Grace in his life because cosmic theology and Gnosticism denies the personal Father-God who has a real and tangible love for every soul he has created. I leave readers with just one of Peterson’s videos with his esoteric theories.
Glory be to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Wednesday, 31 January 2018

THE ICE CREAM FROM HELL.

ONE HELL OF AN ICE CREAM.

I don’t need to think how I might compose an introduction to the following post from VIGILANT CITIZEN. It speaks for itself. I did see a small article about this new franchise some days ago and planned to return to it to establish its veracity and perhaps post on it. And how would you be? My previous post looked at blasphemy in a clothing ad. and now this. So I am now prompted to dig up some more that occurs in the so-called art world, so look out for it  –  not because of any sensationalist factor, but because all this points to a trend of attacks against Christianity that society should be aware of to make some conclusion about where we are heading…….. and that, whether one is a Christian or not. So prepare yourself, because this is awful. [Have to wonder if an Ally Akbar Ice Cream Co. will be next. I don’t think so]!!

Sweet Jesus: The Disturbing Marketing of a Trendy Ice Cream Franchise

58
The marketing surrounding Sweet Jesus is based on satanic symbolism combined with children in creepy and questionable situations. 
Sweet Jesus is an absurdly popular ice cream chain that’s been around for a few years and is quickly expanding in Canada and the United States. Deemed “Toronto’s Most Overrated Ice Cream” by the Globe and Mail, Sweet Jesus nevertheless attracts huge crowds on a daily basis. The chain has been enjoying lots of media coverage and because its stores are custom-made to be “Instagrammable”, Sweet Jesus is all over social media.
The chain does not only serve ice cream to its customers: The “experience” also involves intense imagery and Biblical references. This peculiarity even prompted a lengthy article on Medium that analyzes the “Christian symbolism” of the shop. While the article is very in-depth and used all kinds of references, it completely missed one point: The symbolism is not Christian, it is satanic. But it was close … satanic symbolism is based on the inversion and the corruption of Christian symbols and Biblical references.
The logo consists of the words Sweet Jesus combined with two satanic symbols: An inverted cross and a lightning bolt.
These two symbols are an important part of the imagery of the Church of Satan.
An altar of the Church of Satan with inverted crosses.
To those who say: “The inverted cross is not satanic, it is actually the Cross of St Peter. I read that on Wikipedia”. Nope! In this context, it is satanic. Satanic Black Masses are all about the inversion of Christian symbols to represent a diametrically inverted philosophy.
The symbol of the lightning bolt is also prevalent in satanism. It most likely originates from the Bible passage where Jesus said: “I saw Satan falling like lightning from heaven”.
The sigil of Anton Lavey (the founder of the Church of Satan) features a lightning bolt inside an inverted pentagram. A sigil is a symbol used in ceremonial magic to represent the magician’s outcome (and to summon demons).
A Marilyn Manson promo poster. He’s a member of the Church of Satan.
These two symbols make up the logo of Sweet Jesus.
The Sweet Jesus logo in front of a shop.
It’s also on their cups
Inverted cross, lightning bolt, pyramid, eyeballs. Remember when eating ice cream was not a satanic ritual?
The marketing of the brand is all about ridiculing Jesus combined with satanic symbolism.
That’s funny because Jesus bore his cross before he got crucified. Also, gluttony is considered to be one of the seven deadly sins by some Christian denominations.
That’s funny because Jesus … whatever.
Other ads combine Christianity with thinly veiled sexual innuendos.
“Let Sweet (lightning bolt) (inverted cross) Jesus into your mouth” … Um, no thanks.
“Love is patient, love is kind” is the beginning of a popular Bible verse. It is followed in this ad by “but you can’t lick it so who cares”. The popsicle stick is held in a phallic matter. There are satanic symbols on the chalice. But who cares.
This ad cites the commandment about using the Lord’s name in vain … followed by using the Lord’s name in vain. And of course, satanic symbols on the commandment tablet.
Here’s another “project” by the same graphic designer. Since it is not an ad selling ice cream, it is a little more … blatant.
Another creation by graphic designer Murilo Maciel.
Although none of this would EVER exist if it ridiculed any other religion, one can still dismiss the above as an attempt at being “edgy and clever”. However, there’s more.
Sweet Jesus also created ads involving children. And they’re creepy. Not fun creepy. They confirm that this is not simply about being “edgy” … there’s a connection with the darker, more sinister side of the occult elite: Preying on children.

Using Children

Most of the marketing surrounding Sweet Jesus involves fashion magazine-style photoshoots involving children and ice cream. One might think: “Well, that’s normal enough, right? Children love ice cream.” But these pictures involve children in a creepy way. At best, the pics “adultize” children. At worse, they sexualize them.
This kid is dressed like a sailor and he’s doing all kinds of adult things: Smoking, wearing tattoos, drinking coffee from a cup with a satanic logo. But, more importantly, why does the kid have a bruised eye? Child abuse?
This picture is very creepy. First, the entire thing is reminiscent of the horribly exploitative world of child pageants. This blond girl looks eerily similar to JonBenet Ramsey – the child pageant star who got savagely murdered in bizarre circumstances. Also, the girl has pink stuff around her mouth reminiscent of blood. To make things even more disturbing, the girl has bunny ears – not unlike Playboy bunnies.

The company’s IG page featured this “behind the scenes” pic of the above picture, along with the borderline creepy comment “Tough day at the office, eh kiddo.”. The other comments got real.
These two boys have strange animal masks on their heads. You know who else loves to wear strange animal masks?
These guys! (This is a picture from the Church of Satan website).
This girl has one eye emphasized by a magnifying glass – effectively doing the one eye sign. The magnifying glass’ handle is actually an antler.
In occult circles, holding animal horns or antlers represent drawing power from Baphomet.
Occultist Marina Abramovic holding the horns of a goat. Powerful occult meaning.
This girl has a “crown” made of what looks like tiny antlers. She looks like she has blood all over her hand and she is also sucking on her thumb. No.
A shirtless kid. He has the satanic symbols right on his glasses. Nope.
People from Sweet Jesus donating to “Sick Kids” … Not before they teach the kids how to throw up the devil horns, though.

In Conclusion

Associating the decadence of deserts with the devil is nothing new. However, Sweet Jesus takes thing way further. It is not simply about “edgy images”, it is about an entire culture that is perfectly in line with the occult elite.
As seen in previous articles on this site, a main agenda of the occult elite is the normalization of powerful satanic symbolism, which is based on the corruption and desecration of Christian symbols. But that’s just the surface of it. The marketing of Sweet Jesus also subtly implies the corruption and desecration of children. This is where things stop being “cool and edgy” and the ugly head of pure evil sticks out.
And there’s nothing sweet about it.

Tuesday, 30 January 2018

THE EU SANCTIFIES BLASPHEMY.

Jesus In Jeans.

Advertising, Strasbourg: it is permissible to use Jesus and Mary on posters and on the web
IN SHORT:  A Lithuanian court fined the company responsible for depicting Our Lord and Our Lady in a clothing ad. [around $1000 Aud.], following a complaint from a Catholic group [there can’t be too many of those in Lithuania]. The company appealed to the EU court of Human Rights which subsequently over-ruled the Lithuanian court and ordered them to repay the company. Such is the totalitarian power of the EU that it can over-rule the self-determination of a sovereign state.
And readers will anticipate my next point: according to the EU the ad. is not inciting hate and religious symbology is up for grabs. So, why will NO country in the world permit even the public propagation of a benign image of Mohammed, let alone for advertising, satire or animation? Okay, that’s a rhetorical question as we all know why, but what’s good for the goose is obviously offensive to the gander.
Here is the article for those with too much time on their hands……….
from this mob: http://www.repubblica.it/esteri/2018/01/30/news/pubblicita_gesu_e_maria_lituania_strasburgo-187639238/?ref=RHPPLF-BH-I0-C8-P4-S1.8-T1
ROME – The European Court of Human Rights legitimizes and defends the use of religious symbols in advertising and condemns Lithuania for having fined a company that used Jesus and Mary on posters and the internet to sell clothes. According to the judges, the fine imposed for “offended public morality” violated the right to freedom of expression of the company.
The facts date back to 2012 when a Lithuanian company that produces clothes launches an advertising campaign using the photo of a man and a woman with a halo, he in jeans and tattooed, she with a white dress and a beaded necklace, accompanied by phrases “Jesus, what trousers!”, “Dear Mary, what dress!” and “Jesus and Mary, what do you wear!”.
The advertisements triggered a series of protests sent to the National Agency for the Defense of Consumer Rights.
The latter, after asking the opinion of the self-regulating body of the advertising specialists and the Lithuanian episcopal conference, concluded that the advertisements did not respect religion and therefore were a violation of public morals and imposed a fine of 580 euros on the company. .
In today’s ruling, which will become final within 3 months if the parties do not appeal, the judges affirm that the national authorities have a wide margin of maneuver on similar issues especially in cases involving a commercial use of religious symbols.
However, the prosecutors point out that the advertisements in question “do not appear to be gratuitous offensive or profane” and “do not incite hatred”, and therefore the authorities are required to provide relevant and sufficient reasons why they would be contrary to public morality. Instead in this case the reasons given by the authorities “are vague and do not explain with sufficient accuracy why the reference in advertisements to religious symbols was offensive”.
In particular, the Court criticizes the authorities for having judged that advertisements “promoted a lifestyle incompatible with the principles of a religious person” without explaining what the encouraged lifestyle was and how the photos and captions in question were favoring it. . The judges are also critical of the fact that the only religious group consulted to judge the case was the Catholic group.
The sentence states that the Court of Strasbourg considers that “freedom of expression is one of the essential foundations of a democratic society and one of the basic conditions for its progress and for the individual self-realization of each person”. It also “extends to ideas that shock, offend or disturb”. He also emphasizes that the Lithuanian authorities have held publicity contrary to public morality because they have used religious symbols “for superficial purposes”, “distorting their main purpose” and being “inappropriate”.
However, for the Court these findings are “vague and insufficient to explain why the reference to religious symbols in advertisements is offensive, if not for the fact that the purpose is not religious”. Moreover, for the judges, the images “do not seem gratuitous offensive or profane, nor do they incite hatred for reasons of faith or attack a religion in an abusive or gratuitous way”.
The court concludes that the local authorities have not “reached the right balance between the protection of public morals and the rights of religious people on the one hand, the right to freedom of expression of the company on the other”. The positions they expressed, he justified, “show that they have given
total priority to protect the sentiments of religious people, without taking into consideration the right to freedom of expression of the company. “Vilnius, therefore, will have to compensate the company with 580 euros.

A DEEP STATE CATHOLIC SPRING? | john namnik

A DEEP STATE CATHOLIC SPRING? | john namnik