Opinions about the Covid pandemic vary greatly. This post relates to the line of thought that the Covid-19 virus does not exist. Among those claiming this is Jon Rappoport who has scores of blog posts on his web site. This, below, is merely his latest, and I post it since it is not merely supposition but refers to the CDC official site itself. First, there is a video on what Jon has picked up [click on the facebook link shown]. Second, there is Jon's own post.
ANOTHER key architect of the COVID PCR test had no coronavirus; the whole fake COVID house is falling down.
“We know exactly what we’re doing, but we have no virus available.”
by Jon Rappoport
October 13, 2020
I’ve been exposing the fact that the CDC, in July of this year, admitted, in a document, that…
They didn’t have the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It wasn’t “available.”
This means they couldn’t obtain an isolated specimen of the virus. There is only one reason why.
The virus hasn’t been isolated. And THAT means no one has proved it exists.
And now, I’ve discovered ANOTHER key document. This one apparently
formed the basis for the first PCR test aimed at detecting the COVID
virus all over the world.
READ WHAT THIS STUDY SAYS. These quotes should be engraved in stone
above the entrance to a museum dedicated to the history of medical
fraud.
“We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use
in public health laboratory settings without having virus material
available.”
TRANSLATION: We want to develop a test to detect the new COVID virus without having the virus.
“Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its
design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS
coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”
TRANSLATION: We HAVE developed a diagnostic test to detect the new
COVID virus. We ASSUME this new virus is closely related to an older
coronavirus. We ASSUME we know HOW it is related. We ASSUME, because
we don’t have the new COVID virus. Therefore, all our assumptions are
made out of nothing. Actually, we have no proof there is a new
coronavirus.
“The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from SARS-CoV.”
TRANSLATION: Our new test to detect the new virus? We don’t have the
new virus. We’ve never observed it. We can’t study it directly.
There is no proof it exists. But we will use the test to detect it.
Those quotes from the study are astounding. A diagnostic test for
the virus, but there is no virus. No standard against which to compare
the reliability of the test.
The authors blithely assume they can somehow infer that the virus
exists in the first place, without having an isolated specimen.
Then they assume they can understand the structure of the virus that isn’t there.
The virus isn’t there. It has NOT been isolated. It has NOT been
separated out from other material. Therefore, it has not been observed
and its existence has not been proved.
And yet, the test which these authors have developed is launched, all
over the world, to detect that virus; to promote the unproven notion
that there is a pandemic; to form the basis for counting COVID case
numbers; and ultimately to justify all the lockdowns which have crashed
the global economy and destroyed millions upon millions of lives.
A great deal of confusion has been created, because scientists are
now talking about the “new virus” as if they understand its structure
and sequence. No. They’ve INTERPRETED that genetic structure. And
once they’ve made their interpretations, they gibber about what it
means.
It’s like this. A man has a very thick steel vault. He clams there
is a pile of treasure inside. But no one can open the door to the
vault. People show up with all sorts of fancy instruments, and they
make indirect measurements. They then issue very authoritative-sounding
statements about what is inside the vault.
But no one can get in there. This is a magic vault, you see. You
can’t drill into it. You can’t blow it up. But in its vicinity, all
sorts of hustlers are gathered. And they PONTIFICATE. They BLOVIATE.
They wave their credentials. Reporters interview them. Governments
follow their recommendations.
And that’s all it is. It’s that kind of party.
There is also confusion about what the word “isolate” means, when it
comes to viruses. SAYING you have isolated a virus doesn’t mean you
have.
It may mean you THINK you have the virus inside a mess of material
which contains many different genetic sequences and all manner of
cellular debris and who knows what.
Some scientists will claim “a lesser amount of mess” entitles them to state they’ve “isolated” the virus.
Other scientists will claim that because they can grow, in a dish,
what they BELIEVE to be the virus, this is “proof” that the virus
exists.
They’re wrong.
Still other scientists will say that, in a dish in a lab, they “have
the virus growing”, and they know it, because the virus is destroying
certain cells in the soup in the dish. But in this soup, there are
various added chemicals, and those chemicals could easily be doing the
cell-killing.
So they are wrong, too.
As the late independent researcher David Crowe has written: “And the
word ‘isolation’ has been so debased by virologists it means nothing
(e.g. adding impure materials to a cell culture and seeing cell death is
[as] ‘isolation’).”
This is why something called real-world experiments were introduced
into science. Experiments that were forced out of the lab into the
arena where actual humans live.
In my last article,
I described exactly the kind of experiment that should have been
initiated five minutes after scientists claimed there was an “outbreak
in China.” It’s a large scale study involving humans who were diagnosed
with the “epidemic illness.” Tissue samples would be taken from 500 of
these patients and correctly analyzed via electron microscope
photography.
But studies of that dimension and precision don’t interest scientists
who live in the lab. Such studies are too dangerous. There is every
chance that, in the harsh glare of sunlight, all their warnings about a
vast pandemic will be shown to be false. False and ridiculous. Absurd.
And insane.
These “experts” don’t want to take that chance.
So they fiddle and diddle in their labs, and they make wild claims based on nothing, on NO VIRUS.
For them, there is no such thing as NO VIRUS. There must always be a
virus. They will build strings of thought that circle around and meet
up and shake hands and justify themselves, BY DEFINITION.
When all is said and done, that is what they are playing at. “We
make all the definitions, and therefore we can conclude anything we want
to conclude. And call it science.”
That’s what’s going on.
I see the con and I’m pointing out the con.
I’m telling scientists who are honest to call it a con, too.
Empty out the house of modern virology; open the windows and let the
fresh air in; and then we’ll be living in a far better world.
And, oh yes, prosecute these researchers who devised a test for the
virus they never found. Prosecute them for crimes against humanity, and
send them to prison.
"They Are Trying to Establish a 'Neo-Church'" -- New Interview of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò
In a new interview, Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano criticizes the fact that a connubium of modernists and Freemasonry wants to create a "neo-church".
(Rome) Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano has been one of the most internationally renowned Church representatives since his sharp criticism of Pope Francis in the McCarrick case.In an interview published yesterday, he spoke about the attempt to replace the Church of Jesus Christ with a "neo-church" and about the Third Mystery of Fatima.
Cardinal McCarrick had risen to become the most influential cardinal in the United States under Pope Francis. Although in June 2013, in his capacity as Apostolic Nuncio to the United States, Archbishop Vigano had informed the Pope in detail about Cardinal McCarrick's homosexual double life and his corruption of priests and seminarians, Francis remained inactive.
It wasn't until the New York Times published McCarrick's legacy in July 2018 that Francis stripped him of cardinalship. But when the head of the church declared that he knew nothing of all that he had otherwise acted earlier, it was too much for Archbishop Vigano. He accused Francis of in fact covering up McCarrick's machinations for more than five years and making him his adviser. The archbishop accused Francis not only of cover-up and omission, but also of lying, and called on him to resign. Francis declined to comment.
Archbishop Vigano, on the other hand, has been living in secret "for fear of retribution" ever since and only goes public in writing. An exception was the Acies ordinataagainst the "Synodal Way" of the German Episcopal Conference, which took place in Munich last January. Archbishop Vigano surprisingly mingled with the participants.
Yesterday he gave an interview to the Portuguese newspaper Dies Iraein which he also commented on the Third Secret of Fatima.
DIes Irae: Excellency, thank you for giving us this interview. We are in the midst of the COVID-19 epidemic that has affected the lives of millions of people in recent months and has even caused the deaths of many of them. In view of this situation, the Church, through the Episcopal Conferences, has decided to close virtually all churches and to deprive the faithful of access to the sacraments. On March 27, In front of an empty St. Peter's Square, Pope Francis led a hypothetical prayer for humanity in an apparently media-friendly manner. There have been many reactions to the way in which the Pope carried out this moment, one of which tried to link the lonely presence of Francis with the message of Fatima, that is, with the Third Mystery. Do you agree?
Archbishop Vigano: First of all, allow me to say that it is a pleasure for me to give this interview to the faithful of Portugal, to whom the Blessed Virgin has promised to keep it in the Faith even in these times of great trial. You are a people with great responsibility, because you may soon have to preserve the holy fire of religion, while other nations refuse to recognize Christ as their king and the blessed Mary as their queen.
The third part of the message, which Our Lady entrusted to the shepherd children of Fatima so that they may deliver it to the Holy Father, is still secret. Our Lady asked for it to be revealed in 1960, but John XXIII issued a press release on 8 February of that year declaring that the Church "does not want to assume the responsibility of guaranteeing the truthfulness of the words which the shepherd children say the Virgin Mary addressed to them." With this distancing from the message of the Queen of Heaven, a cover-up operation began, apparently because the content of the message would have revealed the terrible conspiracy against the Church of Christ by its enemies. Until a few decades ago, it would have seemed unthinkable that one would go so far as to silence even Our Lady. In recent years, however, we have even experienced attempts to censor the Gospel, the word of her divine Son.
In 2000, during the pontificate of John Paul II, the Secretary of State, Cardinal Sodano [1990–2006], presented his own version as the Third Secret, which, due to some elements, clearly seemed incomplete. It is not surprising that the new Secretary of State, Cardinal Bertone [2006–2013], tried to draw attention to an event from the past, only to make the people of God believe that the words of the Virgin had nothing to do with the Church crisis and with the interaction of modernists and Freemasonry behind the scenes of the Second Vatican Council. Antonio Socci, who has carefully examined the Third Secret, exposed this deliberate behaviour of Cardinal Bertone. At the same time, it was Bertone himself who strongly discredited and censored the tears of Tears of Our Lady of Civitavecchia, whose message perfectly matches what she had said in Fatima.
Let us not forget the unnoticed appeal of Our Lady to the Pope encouraging all bishops to consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart in order to defeat Communism and atheist materialism: not to consecrate "the world, not that nation that you want us to consecrate to you ", but "Russia". Did it cost too much to do that?
Today, with a President of the Russian Federation who is certainly a Christian, this request of the Virgin could be fulfilled in order to avert further catastrophes for the Church and the world.
Benedict XVI also confirmed the topicality of the message of the Virgin Mary, although according to the interpretation spread by the Vatican, it is to be regarded as complete. Those who have read the Third Secret said in all clarity that it concerns the apostasy of the Church, which began at the very beginning of the 1960s and has now reached such an obvious stage that it is recognized even by inexperienced observers. This almost compulsive insistence on issues that the Church has always condemned, such as relativism and religious indifferentism, false ecumenism, Malthusian ecology, homoheresy and mass immigration, has found in the Abu Dhabi Declarationthe fulfilment of a plan conceived by secret sects for more than two centuries.
DIes Irae: In the middle of Holy Week and after the Synod of Amazons, the Pope decided to set up a commission to discuss and study the women's diaconate in the Catholic Church. Do you think that this has the purpose of paving the way for the clericalization of women, or, in other words, an attempt to manipulate the priesthood that our Lord Jesus Christ instituted on Holy Thursday?
Archbishop Vigano: The Sacrament of Holy Orders can and will never be changed in its nature. The attack on the priesthood has always been at the heart of the actions of the heretics and their inspirer, and it is understandable that attacking the priesthood means destroying Holy Mass and the Most holy Eucharist, as well as the entire sacramental structure. Among the conspiratorial enemies of the Sacrament of Holy Orders, there was, of course, no shortage of modernists who, since the 19th century, have theorized a Church without priests or with priests and priestesses. These delusions, anticipated by some representatives of modernism in France, subtly resurfaced at the Second Vatican Council in an attempt to imply a certain equivalence between the official priesthood resulting from the Sacrament of Holy Orders and the general priesthood of the faithful emerging from baptism. It is significant that it is precisely through the play with this deliberate misunderstanding, the reformed liturgy [Novus Ordo] is also affected by the doctrinal error of Lumen gentium, going so far as to reduce the consecration to mere presiding in a meeting of [general] priests. The priest is in reality an old Christ, not because the people appoint him, but through the ontological alignment with the high priest Jesus Christ, whom he has to imitate in the holiness of life and in the absolute devotion, which is also represented by celibacy.
The next step therefore had to be necessarily followed, if not by the extinguishing of the priesthood, then at least by making it ineffective by extending it to women who cannot be consecrated. It is precisely what has happened in the Protestant and Anglican sects, which today are also experiencing the embarrassing situation of having lesbian bishops in the so-called Church of England. It is obvious that the ecumenical "pretext" – that is, the approach to deviating communities, even by accepting the latest errors – is based on Satan's hatred of the priesthood and would inevitably ruin the Church of Christ. At the same time, ecclesiastical celibacy is also the target of the same attacks, because it belongs unmistakably to the Catholic Church and is a valuable protection for the priesthood, which tradition it has kept vigorously throughout the centuries.
The attempt to introduce a form of consecrated women's ministry in the Church, despite the repeated declarations of the Magisterium, is not new. John Paul II, too, clearly defined, with all the canonical requirements of an infallible ex-Cathedra declaration, that it is absolutely impossible to question the doctrine on this subject. But just as one has put one's hand on the Catechism to declare the death penalty "not in conformity with the Gospel", which is unprecedented and heretical, so today one tries ex novo to invent some form of female diaconate – propaedeutic, of course, for the future introduction of the women's priesthood.
The first Commission set up by Bergoglio years ago issued a negative opinion and confirmed what could not even have been discussed. Because a commission was unwilling to obey Francis' wishes, this does not mean that another commission whose members he chooses could not be more "docile" and more willing to destroy another pillar of the Catholic faith. I have no doubt that Bergoglio has convincing methods and that he can put pressure on the Theological Commission. But I am equally sure that in the unfortunate event that this consultative body should give a favourable opinion, it will not necessarily need an official statement by the Pope to see the introduction of deaconesses in the dioceses of Germany or Holland – while Rome is silent on this. This method is well known and makes it possible, on the one hand, to attack the priesthood and, on the other hand, to provide a pleasant alibi for those within the ecclesial structures who thus claim at all times that "the Pope has not allowed anything new". This is exactly what they have done by authorizing the Episcopal Conferences to allow autonomous hand-Communion, which was enacted by abuse and has now become a worldwide practice.
We should remember that this approach to the dogmas of the Church confirms an undeniable fact: Bergoglio has adopted the so-called situation theology, whose loci theologici, theological places, random facts or themes are: the world, nature, the feminine, young people... This is a theology which does not focus on the immutable and eternal truth of God, but on the contrary starts from observing the imperative urgency of phenomena in order to give answers that correspond to the expectations of today's world.
Dies Irae: According to renowned historians, the Second Vatican Council was a break between the Church and tradition. Hence the appearance of ways of thinking, which they want to transform into a mere humanitarian association that embraces the world and embraces its globalist utopia. How do you see this serious problem?
Archbishop Vigano: A church that presents itself as new in contrast to the Church of Christ is simply not the Church of Christ! The Mosaic religion, that is, the "Church of the Old Law", which was wanted by God to lead His people to the coming of the Messiah, has found its fulfillment and completion in the New Covenant and was finally revoked on Calvary by the sacrifice of Christ. From his open side came the New and Eternal Covenant, which replaced the synagogue. It seems that the post-Conciliar, modernist and Freemason Church also aims to transform, overcome, and replace the Church of Christ with a "neo-church", a disfigured and monstrous creature that does not come from God.
The purpose of this neo-church is not to get the chosen people to recognize the Messiah, just as it is not the purpose for the synagogue to convert and save all peoples from the second coming of Christ, which is the purpose of the Catholic Church. Its purpose is rather to constitute itself as the spiritual arm of the New World Order and to promote the One World Religion. In this sense, the Council Revolution first had to destroy the heritage of the Church, its thousand-year-old tradition from which it drew its vitality and authority as the mystical body of Christ. Then it was a matter of getting rid of the representative of the old hierarchy, and only recently she began to show herself to be what she wants to be, without pretense or camouflage.
What you call utopia is in fact a dystopia, because it represents the concreteization of the plan of Freemasonry and prepares the appearance of the Antichrist.
I am also convinced that the majority of my confreres, and especially almost all priests and believers, are not fully aware of this hellish plan, and that recent events have opened the eyes of many. Their faith will enable our Lord to gather the pusillus grex, the small flock, before the final confrontation around the true shepherd.
Dies Irae: In order to restore the ancient splendour of the Church, it will be necessary to question many aspects of the Council's teaching. What points of the Second Vatican Council would you question?
Archbishop Vigano: I believe that there is no shortage of important personalities who have already expressed the critical points of the Council better than I have. There are those who believe that it would be less complicated and certainly wiser to follow the practice of the Church and the Popes as it was used in the Synod of Pistoia. It also contained good things, but the errors it claimed were considered sufficient to make them forgotten.
This Irae: Is the current pontificate the culmination of a process that begins with the Second Vatican Council and was longed for in the so-called "Catacomb Pact", or is it still an intermediate phase?
Archbishop Vigano: As with any revolution, the heroes of the first hour often fall victim to their own system, as was the case with Robespierre. Those who were regarded yesterday as the flag bearers of the Council Spirit now appear almost as conservatives: the examples of this are visible before all eyes. There are already those who, in the intellectual circles of progressivism (such as those frequented by a haughty Massimo Faggioli), begin to dispel doubts here and there about Bergoglio's real abilities, to make "courageous decisions" – for example, to abolish celibacy, to allow women to the priesthood, or to legitimize the Communicatio in sacris with heretics – almost as if he were hoping that he would step down in order to elect a pope who was even more obedient to the elites who had their most unscrupulous and determined followers in the Catacomb Pact and in the Mafia of St. Gallen.
This Irae: Our Excellency, we Catholics today often feel isolated from the Church and almost abandoned by our shepherds. What can you say to the hierarchs and believers who, despite the confusion and error that are spreading in the Church, are trying to persevere in this tough struggle to maintain the integrity of our faith?
Archbishop Vigano: My words would certainly be inadequate. I confine myself to repeating the words of our Lord, the eternal word of the Father: "Be sure, I am with you all the days until the end of the world." Of course, we feel isolated: but did the Apostles not feel that way, and all Christians? Didn't even Our Lord feel abandoned in Gethsemane? These are times of trial, perhaps of the last trial: we must drink the bitter cup, and even if it is human emanating from the Lord to let him pass by us, we must repeat with confidence: "But not as I will, but as you will" and remember His words of consolation: "In the world you are in affliction; but have courage: I have conquered the world."
After trial, however hard and painful it may be, the eternal reward will be prepared for us that no one can take away from us. The Church will once again radiate the glory of her Lord after this terrible and long-lasting Easter triduum.
Although prayer is undoubtedly indispensable, we must not relent on fighting the good struggle, but should make everyone witnesses of a courageous spirit of struggle under the banner of the Cross of Christ. Let us not allow the finger to be pointed at us, as the maid did in the court of the high priest with Saint Peter: "You also were one of his disciples," and then he denied Christ. Let us not be intimidated! Let us not allow the gag of tolerance to be applied to those who wish to proclaim the truth! Let us ask the Blessed Virgin and Our Lady Mary that our tongue can courageously proclaim the kingdom of God and Hs righteousness. May the miracle of Lapa be renewed, where the blessed Mary gave back the voice to little Joana, who was born dumb. May she also give us a voice, her children, who have remained silent for too long.
Our Lady of Fatima, Queen of Victories, ora pro nobis.
Introduction/translation: Giuseppe Nardi Picture: Corrispondenza Romana
Welcome to Fiona’s Book Club.
I recently had to sever ties with an old and dear friend, due to her
addiction to the occult. A decade ago, my friend (‘Alison’) began paying
a guru/witch (‘WitchyD’) for past life regression ‘therapy’, aura
reading and manipulation, and kinesiology. Under WitchyD’s influence,
Alison’s brain and life slowly turned to shit. My friend became vague
and started making poor decisions (which landed her in court on a
serious gun charge). Alison abandoned responsibility for her own
behaviour and blamed her issues on either other people, or her ‘past
life’ experiences that WitchyD implanted in her mind, via suggestion.
Several years ago, Alison began divorce proceedings against her
ex-husband. Her primary approach to this procedure consisted of
gathering with WitchyD and another coven participant, to summon her ex’s
aura, to command her ex’s aura into giving her what she desired out of
their financial settlement. When Alison divulged this, I urged my friend
to, “Get a divorce lawyer!” However, Alison ignored all of my free
practical advice in favour of her paid esoteric charmer. Consequently,
my friend got totally screwed over and her cunning ex won everything.
Alison had engaged in witchcraft. I define witchcraft as intentional
manipulation of the elements in order to achieve one’s will. Alison had
in fact dabbled in black witchcraft – without having been instructed on
the consequences of such, or how witches protect themselves against the
inevitable backlash. Witchcraft carries its own set of rules, and if one
wants to play with witchcraft, one must abide by its rules. My friend
failed to do this.
A documentary exposing Jordan Peterson’s agenda to subvert and
destroy the rising political right wing, and neutralize European
nationalism.
This video completely exposes Peterson’s
anti-White agenda and his strategy for implementing it. Any Peterson
fans who are not beyond saving will be deprogrammed by watching this
video.
Jordan Peterson’s primary goal is to neutralize the
political right and White identity. He does not care about the Marxist
take over of our nations, in fact he was hired by the United Nations to
help usher it along. Peterson’s only reason for stepping into the
limelight was because he saw a massive right wing backlash fomenting,
and realized it was going to destroy the left.
His job is
to implement “plan B”, to steer the rising tide of nationalism into an
impotent cul-de-sac of centrist individualism, giving our enemies just
enough time to tip the demographic balance of our countries so that our
destruction is sealed.
Peterson is explicitly targeting
young White males for indoctrination with an insidious political
ideology he calls radical individualism. He has created a
pseudo-religion self-help cult; he is delivering his ideology to the
disaffected youth by combining it with a self-help regimen wrapped in
empty religious metaphor.
While our enemies are working
tirelessly to destroy our nations in a ruthlessly calculated and
organized fashion, Jordan Peterson is brainwashing a generation of
young White men to be atomized individuals who perceive group
cooperation based on ethnic identity and nationality as the height of
evil.
And in the process of doing so, Peterson and his friends are making untold millions of dollars.
TRIGGER WARNING: Discussion of suicide and depression.
I am working on a list of recent deaths, reportedly suicides, of the Glitterati, to research the circumstances and possible connections. As if to save me some time, the following is a list of just some of these published on a site called nworeport.me .While the site and others that have taken up this post have insinuated that they are all connected to the Clinton Child Trafficking Ring, I have omitted that statement as proof is not definitive, [but I do have my own suspicions]. That said, I am well aware of both #PIZZAGATE and the prosecution of Ms. Silsby for child trafficking in Haiti which is connected to the Clinton Foundation. Here then is the raw list, but stay tuned for further posts on this, keeping in mind that some pundits have listed around 40 suspicious deaths connected to the Clintons, not necessarliy allied to child trafficking.
L’Ren Scott
L’Ren Scott, (former girlfriend of Nate Rothschild) was found dead by her assistant at her apartment in the Chelsea neighborhood of Manhattan on March 17, 2014.
The police reported that no note was found and there was no sign of foul play.
The New York City Chief Medical Examiner determined Scott’s manner and cause of death to be “suicide by hanging.”She was 49.
Chris Cornell
Cornell was found unconscious by his bodyguard, hanging from the doorknob in the bathroom of his hotel room at the MGM Grand in Detroit, after performing at a show with Soundgarden at the Fox Theatre on May 17.
He was lying on the floor with an exercise band around his neck and blood in his mouth. An MGM medic and EMS personnel were unable to revive Cornell.
Cornell was pronounced dead by a doctor at 1:30 a.m. Police ruled out homicide by reviewing a hotel surveillance video, which showed nobody entering or exiting the suite after his bodyguard left at around 11:35 p.m.
The cause of death was determined to be “suicide by hanging.”After Chris Cornell’s tragic death, evidence later emerged that he was working with his best friend, Linkin Park singer Chester Bennington, to expose an elite pedophile ring.
Chris and his wife set up a charity called the Chirs and Vicky Cornell Foundation which works to help victims of child abuse.
Chester Bennington
Bennington was found dead at his home in Palos Verdes Estates, California; his housekeeper discovered his body hanging from a doorknob around 9:00 a.m. PDT on July 20, 2017.
His death was officially ruled as suicide.
His bandmate Mike Shinoda confirmed his death on Twitter, writing, “Shocked and heartbroken, but it’s true. An official statement will come out as soon as we have one”.
On July 21, Brian Elias, the chief of operations for the office of the medical examiner-coroner, confirmed that a half-empty bottle of alcohol was found at the scene, but no other drugs were present.
Avicii
Swedish DJ Avicii, real name Tim Bergling, died on 20 April 2018 near Muscat, Oman, at the age of 28.
No cause of death was immediately given.
On 21 April, the Omani police stated that there was “no criminal suspicion” or evidence of foul play in Bergling’s death.
On 26 April, his family released an open letter stating that Bergling “really struggled with thoughts about meaning, life, happiness. He could not go on any longer.”
On 1 May, TMZ reported that the cause of death was a suicide due to self-inflicted injuries.
Although full details of his death were not released, TMZ reports that he suffered cuts from broken glass along with neck injuries.
Although it is unclear what the injuries to his neck were, it could have been caused by asphyxiation and hanging has not been ruled out.
After his death, it emerged that Avicii was working to expose an elite pedophile ring.One of his videos began to recirculate in which he attempts to expose child trafficking.
David Carradine
On June 3, 2009, at the age of 72, Hollywood actor David Carradine was found dead in his room at the Swissôtel Nai Lert Park Hotel on Wireless Road, near Sukhumvit Road, in central Bangkok, Thailand.
He was in Bangkok to shoot his latest film, titled Stretch.
A police official said that Carradine was found naked, hanging by a rope tied to the doorknob of the room’s closet, causing immediate speculation that his death was suicide.
However, reported evidence suggested that his death was accidental, the result of autoerotic asphyxiation.
Two autopsies were conducted, one involving the celebrity pathologist Pornthip Rojanasunan, and both concluded that the death was not a suicide.
The cause of death became widely accepted as “accidental asphyxiation.”Carradine’s lawyer Vicki Roberts said:
“I believe there may have been foul play.”
Reports around the time of his death suggest that Carradine may have been involved in child sex tourism; a rampant issue in Thailand where he was found.
If he was involved in pedophilia, could he have been connected to a wider network of Hollywood elite pedophiles?
Robin Williams
On August 11, 2014, Williams died at his home in Paradise Cay, California.
In the initial report released on August 12, the Marin County Sheriff’s Office deputy coroner stated Williams had hanged himself after he was found hanging from a doorknob with a necktie.
The final autopsy report, released in November 2014, ruled that Williams had committed suicide by hanging himself from the doorknob.
Neither alcohol nor illegal drugs were involved, while all prescription drugs present in his body were at “therapeutic” levels, the coroner declared.
Alexander McQueen
Fashion designer Alexander McQueen’s death was announced on the afternoon of 11 February 2010.
In the morning, his housekeeper found him hanging from a doorknob at his home in Green Street, London W1.
Paramedics were called and they pronounced him dead at the scene.
The Metropolitan Police stated that the note was not suspicious, but did not confirm that the death was a suicide.
The Queen of the Netherlands sister just “hung herself” from her door knob. That particular Queen stepped down after allegations of having “hunts” where children were raped and massacred by her dinner guests.
Aaoron Schwartz hung himself on his doorknob after he hacked into MIT Computers and found a huge stash of Child Pornography.
Michael Hutchence from the band INXS hung himself from his doorknob.
How high are these doorknobs? Wouldn’t your feet and probably your whole body touch the floor? Second of all, what kind of scarves are these? I don’t think I have any scarves strong enough to do the job……Is there some suicide scarf collection out there?
I think this trend of hanging oneself on doorknobs with scarves stinks to high heaven. I am having a hard time buying it.
Sounds like some sort of “calling card” from the real killers.
Who knew Doorknobs were so deadly?
Phi Beta Iota: One of our experts says that cutting off the bloodstream to the brain for 15 seconds causes a loss of consciousness. There are a number of alleged suicides in Europe that appear to be rooted in light strangulation with two fingers first, then hanging of the victim from the doorknob to complete the job. Murder, not suicide. The combination of the doorknob and the scarf appears to be a signature intended to terrorize others who may be thinking about ratting out the elites above them and known to them.
