SECRET BIKIE BUSINESS.

Ask Siri to tell you where the nearest abortion clinic is...she won't. Ask predictive speller to write "fuck" and it won't. A moral law is being applied here, while abortion and swearing do not break legislative law.                                                                                                                                            In the reverse, Catholic law does not prohibit the theft of food to a starving person, but under state legislation that person will be prosecuted.                                                                                                 The fact at work here is that there is a moral or natural law and a legislative law. Sometimes they intersect to either agree or contradict. Great problems here as exemplified by Jesuischarlie: Hebdo contravene a moral law but not a legislative law, hence the assassins believe moral law comes first, so the following is offered in good faith.                                                                                                         Enter Newman's LNP bikie association laws, [love the name "disestablishment act"....personally I'm into antiredisestablishmentarianism ]. Forget [for mine], any U.N. human rights treaties [only because I have personal problems with the U.N.], for they are not needed here. It would seem to be a natural and moral law that humans have a right to associate with others; in fact that doesn't have to be legislated for. But the LNP have done just that .... by legislating against associating with a certain group, the general population is being told by law with whom they can associate. This absolutely has to be a contradiction  and arbitrary quashing of a natural law. The dictum of: "if you are not doing anything wrong then you have nothing to fear", [as arguably applies to CCTV monitoring], has no application here because it criminalises normal and even admirable everyday activities.  A hundred scenarios could be given where innocents will accidentally break these laws, but they will be guilty nevertheless. How the heck does anyone know who will be at the neighbours birthday party?               This has to be said: yes, at times we need extreme laws to protect the population, such as anti-terror laws, curfews in an emergency and so on. But bikies are simply maladjusted throwbacks who profess a peurile code of anarchy, hate for rival clubs, hatred of cops, pronounce the death penalty on any who hurt family, produce and distribute substances that could kill our kids, are into weapons, racketeering and so on. They are stupid and misguided more than evil. They are les of a danger to the populace than paedophile priests, extremist moslems, con men, serial killers and rapists, maniac drivers, fast-food chains, ciggy companies, asbestos producers and banks. So no, this is not written in their defense. It is written in the defence of moral law and as an ALERT to the thin edge of the wedge of Totalitarianism . And I haven't even gone on about bikie's relegation of women, [we don't even need to ask, "relegated to what?" because categorising women is sufficient. Nor have I gone on about their suppression of the individuality of each soul for conformism or conformity to their many childish mores and rules. That grown men need immediate approbation of the group numbers under the banner of demons [hell's angels] or barbarians [mongols] and so on is more of a danger to themselves than to society.                                                                                                                         Outlaws, so self-styled can be dealt with by the organisation society has instituted for its freedom from harm, that's spelled c-o-p-s. Totalitarian laws are a heinous over-reaction.                                      THE CONUNDRUM: I'm happy to harangue all voters in any election. Why? Because we all too often vote to the criterium...What's in it for moi? Rather, shouldn't we temper this with what may be good for our community at large. So yes, the Queensland Opposition has promised to repeal these laws, but Queensland voters must ask; which mob will do the best for the state. I don't envy them.