--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Many sites and You Tubers published so-called evidence of a false flag attack relating to the recent London Bridge Islamic attack. I take a passing interest in such things and acknowledge that many such occurrences are suspicious, however a site that I happen to like a lot promulgated this event as a false flag. The video evidence was shallow and rather puerile in my opinion and I gave my point of view which didn't go down well with the site's fans who seemed to be devotees of conspiracy theories. I sympathize, I really do, since we plebs need to fight back against the elites, the puppet-masters and the Deep State, but phony evidence is not a valid defense and we must do better in seeking truth.
Here then is that so-called evidence which was posted on one of my fav sites [and it needs to be viewed for the rest of my argument to be kept in context]......
There were lots of problems that I had with this 'evidence'.
The tables and glasses section is fatuous, so I will omit comment and concentrate on the well-posted part of the police getting changed. My problems here are with the You Tuber who hasn't bothered to research police uniforms - and this is easily discovered and would conclude that white shirts and dark pants are standard. Second, he has not bothered to do due diligent discovery on such MET units as the Flying Squad or the Counter Terrorist Command. Third, any sophisticated covert operation would not see police getting changed in public outside their van in full view of several people with cameras. Fourth, there is no date and time stamp clear on the video. Fifth, why is there not longer vision - has it been cropped to fit his narrative? Then we come to the substitution of the camo-panted policeman for the terrorist, which is sixth - anyone can see that the body types are different. But then, while the clothing seems to match, it actually doesn't according to a video of the three terrorists running along the road on their rampage. The supposedly substituted terrorist has a light blue sleeved tee shirt which is visible in the video of his dead body - but the policeman was not wearing one. [That video can be found on You Tube].
Then there is the innocent bystander who was attacked and ran off with the police car rolling on. So what?, that's explainable. But, no, I can't explain the lack of flash from 50 rounds fired off, the lack of smoke or the lack of blood - but I'm not a forensic expert. Maybe that's down to the lighting, the types of weapons etc., but for me it is enough to catch this You Tuber out in a lie to debunk his whole premise.
So, in my research, up comes a related video. And I post that now to explain the deception used by this, and other, Troofers............
Before this jihad attack there was the bomber at Manchester and the conspiracy of the false flag nature of that as posted on many sites was even less credible, but I won't go into that. Yes, there are staged events and psy-ops, e.g. I do believe that I was the first Australian poster to expose the White Helmets, which I did in a parody blog post since I had no solid proof, only suspicions which I stuck my neck out for. Subsequently the proof came in to support my post.
The lesson in this is to discern the truth with analysis that basically relies on research and common sense. Looking stupid does not help the cause for those of us who try to fight back against our controllers.
For anyone interested, my post on the White Helmets can be read here........
https://johnnamnik.wordpress.com/2016/09/30/the-white-hellmutts/
No comments:
Post a Comment